rugby-journo
Academy Player
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2010
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
Once again the Sharks are being absolutely raved about. People do not stop talking about the brilliant rugby that the Sharks have been playing lately. I'm not saying that this isn't true. I've loved the way the Sharks have been playing rugby lately and they are one of my least favourite teams. But does no one else see the obvious reason? It's because they haven't had their over-rated Boks to drag them down.
I believe that most of the non-Springbok Sharks are better then the Boks. Take Smit for example. John Smit does not deserve to earn money from playing rugby. He should not even be in the Sharks' 30 man squad. I don't think it's a coincedence that the Sharks have started playing better rugby since he hasn't been playing. Look at how much more they are attacking.
John Smit as captain will lead to a completely non-attack performance. John Smit has led the Sharks to scoring the least ammount of tries two Super 14s in a row. Now that a TRUE leader like Terblanche is captain, the Sharks are scoring bonus points almost every game. I've had enough of people saying "Yes, Smit is a poor player but he is a good leader". No no no. He is a poor player AND a poor leader!
JP. Pietersen has got to be one of the least attacking wings I have ever seen. I don't recall ever seeing him break a tackle although I can recall many from a guy like Mvovo or Ludik.
In general, the guys that haven't got Bok caps are actually playing far better rugby then those that are.
Burden = Better then Smit
Cilliers (On CURRENT form) = Better then Mtawarira
McLeod = Better then Pienaar
Lambie = Better then Pienaar was at flyhalf
Mvovo = Better then JPP
And while this may not seem like a very long list, I still believe that not having these guys has benefitted the Sharks tremendously.
I believe that most of the non-Springbok Sharks are better then the Boks. Take Smit for example. John Smit does not deserve to earn money from playing rugby. He should not even be in the Sharks' 30 man squad. I don't think it's a coincedence that the Sharks have started playing better rugby since he hasn't been playing. Look at how much more they are attacking.
John Smit as captain will lead to a completely non-attack performance. John Smit has led the Sharks to scoring the least ammount of tries two Super 14s in a row. Now that a TRUE leader like Terblanche is captain, the Sharks are scoring bonus points almost every game. I've had enough of people saying "Yes, Smit is a poor player but he is a good leader". No no no. He is a poor player AND a poor leader!
JP. Pietersen has got to be one of the least attacking wings I have ever seen. I don't recall ever seeing him break a tackle although I can recall many from a guy like Mvovo or Ludik.
In general, the guys that haven't got Bok caps are actually playing far better rugby then those that are.
Burden = Better then Smit
Cilliers (On CURRENT form) = Better then Mtawarira
McLeod = Better then Pienaar
Lambie = Better then Pienaar was at flyhalf
Mvovo = Better then JPP
And while this may not seem like a very long list, I still believe that not having these guys has benefitted the Sharks tremendously.