Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Tri Nations 2009-2011
Tri Nations XV 2009
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flux" data-source="post: 278329"><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ThemApples @ Sep 14 2009, 11:18 PM) <a href="http://index.php?act=findpost&pid=411732" target="_blank"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div></p><p></p><p>By and large I agree with you, aside from the changes I have highlighted in bold. I realise that the loose forward is a little muddled up, and maybe it wouldn't work, but I felt that those three all deserved to be there. I'd also have Giteau at second five, but Jean De Villers still did more to warrant being there. Sivivatu wasn't in fine form either, but he still did manage to have small moments of brilliance every now and then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flux, post: 278329"] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ThemApples @ Sep 14 2009, 11:18 PM) [url='index.php?act=findpost&pid=411732']<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/url]</div> By and large I agree with you, aside from the changes I have highlighted in bold. I realise that the loose forward is a little muddled up, and maybe it wouldn't work, but I felt that those three all deserved to be there. I'd also have Giteau at second five, but Jean De Villers still did more to warrant being there. Sivivatu wasn't in fine form either, but he still did manage to have small moments of brilliance every now and then. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Tri Nations 2009-2011
Tri Nations XV 2009
Top