Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
What if...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KZNSharksFan" data-source="post: 230940"><p>That guy pretends to give an unbiased scientifically based view but he's almost as bad as Gore et all.</p><p>Global Warming is happening but it is a natural process. This process happens so slowly that 10 years of cooling amidst a warming period is insignificant considering the timescale involved. I think he is trying to stir some **** though, and frankly likes the sound of his own voice. </p><p></p><p>If the Royal Society and a group of highly experienced climatology scientists appointed by the UN are apparently wrong, then who the hell are we supposed to believe? A single scientist who seems to have lost his credibility amongs the scientific community? </p><p>When he says humans don't have any effect on global warming, he is incorrect, because we do. However any CO2 we emit merely contributes to an already well established cycle of glacial and interglacial periods. CO2 is not after all the only factor that affects these processes, in fact it seems it is one of the less significant ones.</p><p></p><p>Scientists are however concerned about the ammounts of CO2 in the atmosphere because there is evidence that rapid increases in atmospheric CO2 has had adverse and equally rapid effects upon the climate in the past.</p><p></p><p>The dispute amongst the vast majority of climatology experts seems to be just exactly how much of an impact we are having, and until that is firmly established by people who know what they're talking about, it seems prudent that we should take steps to reign in or even decrease the current excessive emissions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KZNSharksFan, post: 230940"] That guy pretends to give an unbiased scientifically based view but he's almost as bad as Gore et all. Global Warming is happening but it is a natural process. This process happens so slowly that 10 years of cooling amidst a warming period is insignificant considering the timescale involved. I think he is trying to stir some **** though, and frankly likes the sound of his own voice. If the Royal Society and a group of highly experienced climatology scientists appointed by the UN are apparently wrong, then who the hell are we supposed to believe? A single scientist who seems to have lost his credibility amongs the scientific community? When he says humans don't have any effect on global warming, he is incorrect, because we do. However any CO2 we emit merely contributes to an already well established cycle of glacial and interglacial periods. CO2 is not after all the only factor that affects these processes, in fact it seems it is one of the less significant ones. Scientists are however concerned about the ammounts of CO2 in the atmosphere because there is evidence that rapid increases in atmospheric CO2 has had adverse and equally rapid effects upon the climate in the past. The dispute amongst the vast majority of climatology experts seems to be just exactly how much of an impact we are having, and until that is firmly established by people who know what they're talking about, it seems prudent that we should take steps to reign in or even decrease the current excessive emissions. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
What if...
Top