Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
which Australian Superside will/should get dropped?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bruce_ma gooshvili" data-source="post: 868216" data-attributes="member: 74121"><p>The latest Wallabies squad contains debuts for:</p><p></p><p>3x Reds</p><p>2x Rebels</p><p>2x Force</p><p></p><p>No new Waratahs or Brumbies. </p><p></p><p>Totals in squad are:</p><p></p><p>5x Rebels</p><p>6x Brumbies</p><p>6x Force</p><p></p><p>So not only do the Brumbies get the smallest crowds of the three sides despite having the most "success", they don't contribute any more talent to the national side than the other two and are starting to become less productive than the other two in cultivating top talent for the Wallabies. They are also based in a far, far smaller city (as said previously). </p><p></p><p>I appreciate they are the most historied of the three sides but there is no room for sentiment in this decision. The fact that their name has been omitted from the decision making process screams to me of vested interest and favouritism. Are there a few Brumbies old boys in senior positions in the union? Or do the Brumbies have the support of the biggest financial sponsor?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bruce_ma gooshvili, post: 868216, member: 74121"] The latest Wallabies squad contains debuts for: 3x Reds 2x Rebels 2x Force No new Waratahs or Brumbies. Totals in squad are: 5x Rebels 6x Brumbies 6x Force So not only do the Brumbies get the smallest crowds of the three sides despite having the most "success", they don't contribute any more talent to the national side than the other two and are starting to become less productive than the other two in cultivating top talent for the Wallabies. They are also based in a far, far smaller city (as said previously). I appreciate they are the most historied of the three sides but there is no room for sentiment in this decision. The fact that their name has been omitted from the decision making process screams to me of vested interest and favouritism. Are there a few Brumbies old boys in senior positions in the union? Or do the Brumbies have the support of the biggest financial sponsor? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
which Australian Superside will/should get dropped?
Top