Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Who's better? Lomu or Savea?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IKALETAHI" data-source="post: 701324" data-attributes="member: 40455"><p>No offense to You but this sounds like every other journalist who has wrote about Lomu's abilities and didnt really understand anything about athletic physiology. How is it that Lomu was the fastest over 10m in All Blacks (probably the fastest over 40 and the 100 until Howlett came along) have arguably the best swerve and side step ( taking into consideration the distance he was able to get off either foot) and be considered to have poor agility? or the inability to turn and sprint? based on his workout videos he has immense core stability and strength and as witnessed when he ran great explosive power off his first few steps.</p><p></p><p>I think the problem was his fitness. Like Tietjens and John Hart stated in "Anger Within" He was not able to train like other players, His body simply couldn't complete Fitness and Gym programs set out by coaches. Lomu would push himself and never gave up, But could not meet the demands as far as the times to complete certain exercises.</p><p></p><p>As far as the kicking I was referring to the members who were commenting on Lomu's ability under the high ball, it simply wasnt a skilled required when He was playing. I do agree Savea is an awesome talent, But I dont think any player to date had the ability Lomu did as far as genetic potential. Lomu growing up under the currect coaching would have had to develop different skills. Its a shame the NZRU and public don't seem to know what they had or have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IKALETAHI, post: 701324, member: 40455"] No offense to You but this sounds like every other journalist who has wrote about Lomu's abilities and didnt really understand anything about athletic physiology. How is it that Lomu was the fastest over 10m in All Blacks (probably the fastest over 40 and the 100 until Howlett came along) have arguably the best swerve and side step ( taking into consideration the distance he was able to get off either foot) and be considered to have poor agility? or the inability to turn and sprint? based on his workout videos he has immense core stability and strength and as witnessed when he ran great explosive power off his first few steps. I think the problem was his fitness. Like Tietjens and John Hart stated in "Anger Within" He was not able to train like other players, His body simply couldn't complete Fitness and Gym programs set out by coaches. Lomu would push himself and never gave up, But could not meet the demands as far as the times to complete certain exercises. As far as the kicking I was referring to the members who were commenting on Lomu's ability under the high ball, it simply wasnt a skilled required when He was playing. I do agree Savea is an awesome talent, But I dont think any player to date had the ability Lomu did as far as genetic potential. Lomu growing up under the currect coaching would have had to develop different skills. Its a shame the NZRU and public don't seem to know what they had or have. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Who's better? Lomu or Savea?
Top