dude, I apologize for my confusion. I said I was sorry, I said I was very tired. Let's forget this. No, I'm not pathetic enough to pick fights online on purpose, no "kick out of it" :lol: it bores me if you want to know.
What I said about the S.A. NZ match stands though. I understand that wasn't your comment, but I have seen this before about that match so I was just reacting to seeing it again (or so I thought).
And about the SA SCO match: you ARE much too sensitive and biased, I merely said Scotland "gave them a good run for their money", which was the case. I've seen the match you see, so I couldn't care less about ref this ref that, as far as I'm concerned did Scotland play a fantastic match ? Sure did. Then if you say the ref was hellsent and wtvr, sure, maybe. But Scotland definitely played fantastic out there, again, esp. given the fact they had very little to compete with on paper VS South Africa, and with the scrum disadvantage in particular.
You don't see it, but you take what I say much farther than it actually is going. Your pride for the Boks is so strong you think ppl are saying things they aren't actually saying.
To this affirmation, can I ask you in one sentence what you respond:
Scotland, last summer in SA, gave the Boks a very good fight, responded to the physical assault SA was throwing at them, and given the two rosters on paper fought admirably for 80 minutes.
Yes, no ?
