Laldies and Gentlemen
POTUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/881503147168071680
Lol
POTUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/881503147168071680
Lol
my avatar is actually james o'connor's face after seeing that video
Its great it gives me a warm feeling inside tot think how screwed American politics are when I start despairing about ours.I had to check to make sure that wasn't a parody account.
He's the president of the bloody United States and he's memeing on twitter.
Jesus wept.
say you are sorry or i will thumbs down you so hard buddy... we are perfectly fine here no need to worry about usIts great it gives me a warm feeling inside tot think how screwed American politics are when I start despairing about ours.
i live in NOVA so i spend a fair amount of time in DC... one day he's motorcade went by and i don't think anyone gave a ****
this is gonna be an odd 4 (i'm emigrating if it's 8) years to look back on american history
WASHINGTON — Before arranging a meeting with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer he believed would offer him compromising information about Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr. was informed in an email that the material was part of a Russian government effort to aid his father’s candidacy, according to three people with knowledge of the email.
The email to the younger Mr. Trump was sent by Rob Goldstone, a publicist and former British tabloid reporter who helped broker the June 2016 meeting. In a statement on Sunday, Mr. Trump acknowledged that he was interested in receiving damaging information about Mrs. Clinton, but gave no indication that he thought the lawyer might have been a Kremlin proxy.
...
Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, and Paul J. Manafort, the campaign chairman at the time, also attended the June 2016 meeting in New York. Representatives for Mr. Kushner referred requests for comments back to an earlier statement, which said he had voluntarily disclosed the meeting to the federal government. He has deferred questions on the content of the meeting to Donald Trump Jr.
A spokesman for Mr. Manafort declined to comment.
But at the White House, the deputy press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, was adamant from the briefing room lectern that “the president’s campaign did not collude in any way. Don Jr. did not collude with anybody to influence the election. No one within the Trump campaign colluded in order to influence the election.”
...
dtj is truth (RIP)Surely we're headed for impeachement now...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/10/us/politics/donald-trump-jr-russia-email-candidacy.html
Oh, and by way of denial, we have this, from Don Jr
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789418455953413/photo/1
Which.... as far as I can tell, confirms the NYT article, and the worst of the speculation...
dude, nothing is going to get sr... republicans own the house so there is no chance they would bring impeachment charges against himSo will this start to actually reach Don Sr? or does he still have plausible deniability if his son, son-in-law, and best friend are willing to throw themselves under the bus for him?
For that matter - is this the opening round of a "immunity for dirt" deal from Jr?
dude, nothing is going to get sr... republicans own the house so there is no chance they would bring impeachment charges against him
he'll see out this term
Ah well we can hope. I read all 435 seats are up for reelection in the HoR and 33/34 of the 100 Senators. After what's happened in the last two years, never say never.
Of course - by winning and getting the write the history books, whilst sitting in judgement over the losers and not yourself.I am writing a project for school and would apreciate some help from y'all... Can war crimes be justified? any ideas?
When did the Japs use Germ warfare?Of course - by winning and getting the write the history books, whilst sitting in judgement over the losers and not yourself.
At risk of Godwinism, but it's an easy and obvious example; lets look at WWII - had Germany won, then gas chambers would have been justifiable and right; had Japan won, then germ warfare would have been justifiable and right; as it was, USA won, so nuclear holocaust was justifiable and right.
More recently, you could look at the second war in Iraq - generally considered an illegal war, and thus a war crime by definition; however, who's going to arrest and try Bush and/or Blair? Saddam on the other hand was dealt with by a few feet of hemp.
Might is Right I'm afraid, and morality be damned - the winner is untouchable, and the loser is screwed anyway.
Morally speaking - absolutely not.