- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 6,158
- Reaction score
- 5,730
- City & State/Province
- Old Colwyn, North Wales.
If that's international prices.The issue with sales has nothing to do with the appeal of the tournament (it’s still a test match against England, that has draw appeal). The issue is that SARU has significantly hiked up the ticket prices of SA games over the last two years which has made it unaffordable for the majority of South Africans.
Historically the cheapest tickets for this kind of game would probably have been around R250 or £13ish, with the majority of tickets being around R500-R1,000 (£25-45ish). Now the cheapest are R950 (£43) with a high proportion at R2,350-3,000 (£106-136ish).
That might not too high from a European perspective, but keep in mind that the SA median monthly income is R5.5k-ish (£250ish) and an unemployment rate of 33% (43% when you include those that have given up looking for work) and you can see how that amount just isn’t going to work out in the market. (Mean average income is R30k or £1.3k, but SA has significant inequality, so it isn’t a far reflection of the reality of the broader economy).
Add to that SARU have openly commented that they were targeting lower capacity (think it was like 70%) last year when they first did this, because they knew the higher ticket prices and lower capacity meant more profit than lower prices and full capacity. It’s a bit sad really.
Didn't Portugal beat Georgia for the first time in their history the other week?don't think we need a separate thread for the cup but Georgia just beat Uruguay by a try. Would have expected a larger difference.
Stop the count.
they beat them in rugby europeDidn't Portugal beat Georgia for the first time in their history the other week?
Before all the results are in?Stop the count.
We’ll comfortably beat Argentina and SA.Before all the results are in?
Sounds familiar.
I like that confidenceWe’ll comfortably beat Argentina and SA.
Or fantasy?I like that confidence![]()
Or taking the ****.Or fantasy?
receiver is offside so either pk for offside, or scrum for forward pass. I think the scrum is the more appropriate sanction.Isn't a forward pass defined as the ball going forwards (compared to the passer's momentum) with the ball going forwards out of the hands as the prime guide?
Not "receiver was in front of the passer, despite the passer falling forwards, and the receiver reaching behind them"
Unless there's a kick, there is no offside in open play like that. That try was perfectly good in my opinion, and the ref's wording to disallow it was complete garbage. Doesn't matter if the player is in front, so long as the ball is passed backwards, which I thought it was by the direction of the hands. Great take behind him by Attissogbe.receiver is offside so either pk for offside, or scrum for forward pass. I think the scrum is the more appropriate sanction.
Knock on offside?Unless there's a kick, there is no offside in open play like that. That try was perfectly good in my opinion, and the ref's wording to disallow it was complete garbage. Doesn't matter if the player is in front, so long as the ball is passed backwards, which I thought it was by the direction of the hands. Great take behind him by Attissogbe.
Yes, that too.Knock on offside?
really? is that on the back on the world cup? thats the only other way i could see someone playing so many different teams in 12 monthsEngland did it in 02/03, I believe