Why are they still fighting this stuff? Surely the smart tactic would be to hide in a fridge and hope it goes away? All the Tories can do is look worse the more they say.
I've never been involved in the process but my understanding is as well as personal information it's meant to be anything that is considered a security risk of out in the open. That can be personally information but there can be intelligence and things you don't want other nations to know you know and that's when massive areas get redacted. You can compromise ongoing and future operations. That stuff is generally redacted by several intelligence officers. How much say the politicians gets is unknown and image there is push back. Look at the infamous dodgy dossier that led to the UK involvement in Iraq that clearly had political pressure as Downing Street clearly wanted some parts more prominent than other for the case they were presenting.I've got a question for anyone more knowledgeable. What is the redaction process when publishing a report? Basically I feel that reports that look negatively into government actions/handling etc... which are then published by said government are pointless as they seem to end up being parts redacted, withheld or just not published at all. We all know how corrupt this current government is, but it seems to be getting worse. What I don't know is how much power/influence the government has on choosing what is redacted and what is not and under what rules information can be redacted. I understand redacting birthdates, addresses and other personal information etc... but in some of these reports whole paragraphs or sections are redacted. Anyone know a bit more on the process and just how much it is being abused by politicians to hide their own failings?
It's staggering that of all the things and all the times the government would decide to really dig its heels in it would be this issue at this time. Which genius thought "hungry children during a pandemic that would cost us pennies in the grand scheme of things to fix? Yeah let's do that!"Indian child poverty charity offers free school meals in England
Akshaya Patra, which feeds millions in India, opens first of three planned kitchens
![]()
Indian child poverty charity offers free school meals in England
Akshaya Patra, which feeds millions in India, opens first of three planned kitchenswww.theguardian.com
A charity that feeds millions of poor children in India has joined the drive to end holiday hunger in England and distributed its first meals from a new kitchen in Watford.
Hot vegetarian dishes cooked for less than £2 each using a model developed to feed the hungry in cities such as Mumbai and Ahmedabad were dispatched to a school in north London on Tuesday amid growing pressure on the government to reverse its decision not to fund free school meals this half-term.
Don't forget...It's staggering that of all the things and all the times the government would decide to really dig its heels in it would be this issue at this time. Which genius thought "hungry children during a pandemic that would cost us pennies in the grand scheme of things to fix? Yeah let's do that!"
Maybe Cummings is proposing the hatchlings fend for themselves so only the strong may survive.
www.politicalcompass.org
The closer it gets the more worried I am about a civil war. In the same state a judge has reversed a decisions to ban open carry near polling stations.In other news...
Trump says militia that sought to kidnap and kill Michigan’s Gov. Whitmer was ‘maybe a problem, maybe it wasn’t’
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/tr...v-whitmer-was-maybe-a-problem-maybe-it-wasnt/
In a startling moment during his Michigan rally Tuesday, President Donald Trump implied that the militia that attempted to kidnap and kill Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) was maybe or maybe not all that big of a problem.
“People are entitled to say maybe it was a problem, maybe it wasn’t,” Trump told his rally.
It’s a commonly used tactic by Trump to say things like “people say” or “some say” or raise hypotheticals so that it gives him the ability to say “I don’t think that, people do.” But he has never been able to cite the actual person that said that to him.
eu.freep.com
Hmm I'm going to have a stab in the dark and say you must clearly fall into the orange category on the far right labelled "special Trump section", just a hunchWhere Do You Sit Politically? Take the test here (and print out a certificate afterwards if you like), it took me about 10 minutes.
The Political Compass
A typology of political opinions plotted on 2 dimensions: economic and social.www.politicalcompass.org
You know I can't stand Trump, so I didn't even chuckle at your joke. According to the test I'm a Centrist. And I think that sums me up correctly. It's a good test.Hmm I'm going to have a stab in the dark and say you must clearly fall into the orange category on the far right labelled "special Trump section", just a hunch![]()
This election will see how many moderates there are left in the USA who are willing to kick Trump out of office.
I agree, it also gives a very broad picture, but often lacks specifics. I was very left and libertarian, but I would see myself as someone who is closer to centrist. Depending on individual topics I would sometimes lean more right wing. For example I'm all for increasing surveillance if we could ensure it was not abused by those in power because saving even one more person from being killed/raped etc... is more important than people's perception that they are free. However the issues are how it is used and that current systems are heavily flawed. For example facial recognition. Great in theory, but completely flawed in practise.Should say political compass use to be quite interesting but its been around a lot longer than its historical data suggests. Its use to put the LD's slightly left of center and about on Green's on Liberatarian fronts. This was back in Charles Kennedy days when things like national ID cards were massively on the agenda. But have the LD's in terms of thier ideology gone more authortarian as a party? They certainly moved rightwards under Clegg but there was little shift on Liberalism. I also find that laughable against Labour under any of their leaders in recent years especially considering the amount vitriol towards dissenting opinion they spew out.
So whilst it might be useful to where you personally sit take where the parties sit with a pinch of salt. Its felt like for a long time it run by leftish person with an axe to grind.