<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div> Maybe, but I did say that players playing in Scotland aren't well tracked, except for ones known after leaving as a capped player. Also, the fact he was playing ND1 rugby last year doesn't help. However, just because he hasn't been called up doesn't mean he isn't good enough. You should know that, as should I. Look at our national squads - England and Ireland haven't been calling up the best talent all the time. I for instance, would not of had a clue who your new 8 is before this season. Me calling him inferior to Martin Corry because I have never heard of him would be wrong. In fact, he is a very good player. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div> Ok, agreed. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div> I can't argue it any further, we will just have to wait and see. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div> I understand it. Inferior goods versus normal goods always, or mostly, have a higher price attached to them (in terms of rugby, contract). However, although this is fact, the quality of the goods in comparision can't be set in stone. This is becasue of opinion, since people have different opinions on what makes a good apple pie (or inside centre). Therefore, althoug most normal goods will be higher in quality than inferior in most people views, it is not clear-cut, and there are some exceptions where inferior goods are of a higher quality in the majority of minds, and also a lower price, although not in this case. So although Cox is a Tesco value good, he is only definitely cheaper than a Henson or BOD, and not definitley in quality. It has been a good arguement with you el_tk, but I think it is coming to an end soon.