mackerzz
Academy Player
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2017
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 4
Yeah it did end up a bit ****.I think people look back on the last few years of the full super rugby with rose tinted glasses...was far from perfect and was lots of talk about changes, crowds were dwindling fast, uneven game time between NZ and RSA (3-5 pm kick offs in RSA and 730-8pm) kick offs in NZ because the south african broadcaster demanded better times, thats before we talk about the skewed results, the SA african teams being strong at home wasnt even a guarantee anymore, where NZ had 1-2 bad teams every year (often the Highlanders)....SA had 1-2 good ones by the end
current model does have lots of improvements for the fans, better times being the major one, have seen a steady uptick in crowd attendances....so probably a lower ceiling....but more sustainable
I dont think it was sustainable as it was and the only thing i really miss was a effect it appears to have had on the AB (theyve gone a bit soft)
If they keep the aus teams as they are now - Force, Reds, Brumbies, Waratahs
Then new zealand teams - Highlanders, Crusaders, Hurricanes, Cheifs, Blues
The SA Teams - Sharks, Bulls, Lions, Stormers
And the Outliers - 2 Argentinian Teams & Drua
That will make 16 teams,
Have 2 pools of 8 teams, they play each other twice (so 14 games),
top 4 teams from both tables go through, to quarter finals.
To fix the travel issue, make sure that each team is always in that particular country for two week games.