- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 19,661
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Well, in my personal opinion, anybody who speaks like that about a woman or man he/she has had sex with, it's a dirtbag. It's only appropiate to this day and age to talk about someone you banged with a name lesser than human: skank, whore, *****, etc, and then brag about it in whatsapp group, which is childish and ominous but actually quite harmless thing to do. This is the stereotypical anglosaxon knob: going to other places to have sex with some local woman and then brag about it with your mates in a pub when comingback from devastating Mallorca puking evertwhere. I can almost see Paddy Jackson's shrimp tan from here.
But, and here it comes: Paddy Jackson is a hell of a rugby player. A rugby team sacking a competent rugby player seems to me quite wrong. There's no way out of that.
That's the part I have an issue with. They clearly hurt the girl in some way, she may have been eager to do the act initially, but she was not ok with being treated like she didn't exist after. The two players lack basic human compassion in that regard, when someone allows you to be that intimate with them you I believe you do have a duty of care beyond what the law requires to ensure it isn't a negative experience like this. The WhatsApp group is almost immaterial to this, it's just evidence that the claimant was just a body to the accused, it's fair to presume they've treated girls badly in the past as a result and that's what the IRFU don't want to be associated with and fairly so.
I'm going to ignore the bolded because it's misinformed and clearly a personal gripe.
Getting rid of Jackson just adds to the endless evidence that sport is a business, Ireland will make more money without Jackson. If it was Conor Murray, who has been caught up in a similar but less severe event, it may have been different for example. Losing Jackson harms us but because it doesn't make us uncompetitive it doesn't really effect business.