- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Messages
- 1,307
- Reaction score
- 437
Makes this series must win if he wants fo coach again in 2029.
Ah that's absolute crap to be honest. He's been England's best player since the 03 crop and him and Sexton as the 10 / 12 axis was clear as day the best Lions dynamic on that tour to everyone apart from Gatland for the first test.I know Im super down on Farrell but when has he ever had a defining Lions match? He's only ever been in the starting 15 during the 2017 tour and even then shouldn't have
Even the England brilliant games are a handful over his career.
I bloody hate the statement test match animal as if there some kind of x factor.
Don't the lions get significantly more than that?If he gets £100k for this it'll be a travesty.
Don't the lions get significantly more than that?
Even if they pro-rata his fees he'll clear that easy
I think that's the minimum and it can be raised based on performance and tour revenue.I thought it was a £100k per squad member but I could be wrong.
As far as I can see players are expected to bank £100K in aggregate but the exact amount won’t be known for a while as it’s now become a profit sharing arrangement.I thought it was a £100k per squad member but I could be wrong.
I mean if he loses to this aus team anyway it will be his last tbhMakes this series must win if he wants fo coach again in 2029.
I'll take your second point (although I do wonder if him playing IC was the best choice for the Lions) definitely not the first.Ah that's absolute crap to be honest. He's been England's best player since the 03 crop and him and Sexton as the 10 / 12 axis was clear as day the best Lions dynamic on that tour to everyone apart from Gatland for the first test.
I think that's the minimum and it can be raised based on performance and tour revenue.
Presume it is pro rated, maybe somewhat in favour of the injured player who has to go home.
Ah that's absolute crap to be honest. He's been England's best player since the 03 crop and him and Sexton as the 10 / 12 axis was clear as day the best Lions dynamic on that tour to everyone apart from Gatland for the first test.
England played a lot more intelligently from 2013 - 2020 (apart from the collective head loss in the 2015 world cup) than they have since when Farrell was in there pulling strings and before Jones tried and failed to turn then into some team trying innovative things and playing on the cutting edge.
It's a weird call up considering he's replacing Daly but it's also one that will lessen the workload for the midfield and will be a big crutch and a charming man for the Smiths to lean on as they continue to hone their game management in a tricky environmentto do so. A few players can feel hard done by but none could replace Daly's Lions experience in a squad that is quite light on it.
Wouldn't have been my pick but there's definitely more justification to it than pure nepotism.
8 years! We're talking about the NZ tour not the SA one.But the thing is has he done anything in the last 4 years since that lions tour to be selected
Like everything you mentioned may be true (I disagree on some points) but what has he really done to justify select in recent times?
I think he was still having positive impact on England until the end and same with Sarries. Based on this year he shouldn't be there.But the thing is has he done anything in the last 4 years since that lions tour to be selected
Like everything you mentioned may be true (I disagree on some points) but what has he really done to justify select in recent times?
Completely disagree with this, and I was one of his biggest/only cheerleaders - he was sandbagging England at the end massively, making players around him look much worseI think he was still having positive impact on England until the end
Maybe, I thought he was a steady head in England's RWC team.Completely disagree with this, and I was one of his biggest/only cheerleaders - he was sandbagging England at the end massively, making players around him look much worse
Probably the exact opposite for me I prefer mine to looking heads up and looking for dyanamic breaks. Something Farrell never really excelled at he was at his brest when not playing fly half but still a lot of attacks went to die with him as he was too busy managing terirtory to spot the overlap or place someone in a gap.Maybe, I thought he was a steady head in England's RWC team.
No secret I place heightened value on playmakers managing territory very well and decision making around that, I very possibly overvalued it, but feel like he has always been a key contributor in that regard.