Why did we play Wood at 8? Were Morgan and Vunipola injured or not in the team at that time?
Morgan was injured, Vunipola hadn't broken through at that point (although people were saying this was the ideal time for his promotion, maybe prematurely).
Why did we play Wood at 8? Were Morgan and Vunipola injured or not in the team at that time?
Kvesic has a strong leg drive that will net him an extra meter or two. He's a freakish athlete. I can't remember who was saying it, but apparently whereas most other rugby players would eat fast food occasionally, Kvesic wouldn't touch the stuff, he's that invested in his physical training. For his size, he's powerful as hell. But as a forward that is closer to 16st than 17, I think it's simply for a lack of weight that he isn't really a carrier that will burst through tackles. And unlike Tipuric, he doesn't really have the pace to carry like a back. (Unfortunately. I still wonder if a summer spent sprint training would bring out this side in him. He doesn't necessarily need it in his game, but it would be nice to have.) Still, his build is perfect for fetching and helping out in the tight. He's also good for pick-and-going. I just wouldn't emphasise him as a go-to carrier, like I would Ewers or Morgan.Kvesic, Ewers and LCD are all strong carriers.
I disagree that Hartley is a good carrier European level.
If I was building a pack from the ground up, I'd like to have 1 strong carrier in the front, second and back rows.
Preferably with 2 in the back row.
The problem with just having one guy as a ball carrier is that you dampen his potential effect by not offering the opposition any other ball carriers to distract them.
Kvesic, Ewers and LCD are all strong carriers.
The problem with just having one guy as a ball carrier is that you dampen his potential effect by not offering the opposition any other ball carriers to distract them.