goodNumber10
International
Sarries won because they were better and didn't let bath in it simple
I agree, they were better in attack and defence than Bath.
Sarries won because they were better and didn't let bath in it simple
It's still on going...
I'm not sure how I feel about the salary cap in general on one hand it's suppose to keep everyone on an equal playing field but there are ways to bend the rules (American players have been known to take "pay cuts" to play in a better overall side). Also we're not on a equal playing field at the highest level (European rugby) as the French teams have no cap so something really need to be looked. Keeping the integrity of the competition by not allowing teams to buy titles but on equal measure not tying a hand behind their back at the next level.
It bends them by not being within the spirit of what they are intended (creating superstar teams that are impossible to beat) if everyone got paid their market value it's likely teams would be a lot closer plus when you stuff as a star you getter sponsorship deals thus get paid more than you normally would.American players taking pay cuts doesn't bend the rules at all. Confused about that point.
or are you saying Sarries won it because the day got to bath?
Should Farrell been sent off for the tackle on Watson.
He is occasionally not very good at rugby.
To be fair, Strettle is mr average.
He does everything adequately while doing nothing to an international standard. Good guy to have as a backup but not good enough for a starter IMO.
Pay cuts are ok if that is what they do but really?
Incidentally there is a cap in France albeit higher than the UK. What you see for French teams are overall budgets of 30 odd million euro but that is for total costs. That being said, they have more external funding money for more teams which means the game can survive with a higher pay cap for players!
watson is tackled, farrell goes for the shoulder tackle and watson falls as he does so.
OK, I must have only ever seen matches in which he played well.
If you have no salary cap then you end up with a few superclubs who always win everything. No better illustration of this than English Premier League football. In the last 20 years, only four teams have won it; Man U (11 times), Chelsea (4 times), Arsenal (3 times) and Man C (twice). THe rest are locked in a mid-table battle for the remaining places in Europe, or a bottom of the table struggle to stave off relegation. Is this what people want for the Aviva Premiership?
Currently, your Premiership is one of the most even domestic rugby competitions in the world. Over the same time period as the EPL (and I am aware that the Premiership salary cap was only introduced in 1999), you have had nine different teams win it (and four different winners in the last five years) In a competition involving only 12 teams in any one year, I would call that an outstandingly successful application of a salary cap.
I heard Kay say that at the time, but watch him... he doesn't change height at any point.
It's definitely not red, and Watson definitely didn't fall/duck into it.
I thought it should have been a yellow (not red) but I've only seen it in the emotional pressure cooker of the stadium where my team are playing a final so I'm definitely not dispassionate to make a reliable judgement on it. Although Farrell made another high tackle later and 2 by the same player is a definite yellow.
Didn't hear Ford's comments, what did he say?
Possibly yellow for the Watson one but, as mentioned before, Farrell went on to do another high tackle. You can't have the same player making 2 high tackles and getting away with it.
Also what on Earth happened when the Sarries scrum was completely destroyed by Bath and Barnes allowed Sarries to play on when one of their players picked it up?
Also what on Earth happened when the Sarries scrum was completely destroyed by Bath and Barnes allowed Sarries to play on when one of their players picked it up?
OK, I must have only ever seen matches in which he played well.
If you have no salary cap then you end up with a few superclubs who always win everything. No better illustration of this than English Premier League football. In the last 20 years, only four teams have won it; Man U (11 times), Chelsea (4 times), Arsenal (3 times) and Man C (twice). THe rest are locked in a mid-table battle for the remaining places in Europe, or a bottom of the table struggle to stave off relegation. Is this what people want for the Aviva Premiership?
Currently, your Premiership is one of the most even domestic rugby competitions in the world. Over the same time period as the EPL (and I am aware that the Premiership salary cap was only introduced in 1999), you have had nine different teams win it (and four different winners in the last five years) In a competition involving only 12 teams in any one year, I would call that an outstandingly successful application of a salary cap.
Also Farrell MOTM was a bit of a joke I felt someone like Burger had a brilliant game where Fazlet felt like he was non existent for many parts. We'll soon go the way of the Superbowl and give it to the quarterback everytime no matter if another player plays out his skin all match.
I would've gone for Jamie George, if only for outpacing Roko!