W
woosaah
Guest
Ok it was a "major" improvement to rugby 2006, what do you guys think? was it worth them putting it on the box?
i am bored
i am bored
the grassOriginally posted by woosaah@Feb 17 2006, 02:36 PM
Ok it was a "major" improvement to rugby 2006, what do you guys think? was it worth them putting it on the box?
i am bored![]()
The same as they do with all the FIFA games, sometimes they release two in one year, the same game with little changes.Originally posted by CeeJay@Feb 17 2006, 04:28 PM
As mark shaw pointed out in the other thread, i think its unreasonable to expect them to build a new game every year. 2005 was ok, and theyve built on it and made it great so far IMO.
Once again I agree with some of Big T's points. There is that something missing. I played 2005 from it's release date until I bought 2006 home on the release date. By that time I played 05 on hard and completed world league with the default team. It became so easy that I used Heffler and co. for a challenge to get to the top of division one and I did (on side view). In my world league on elite at the moment (classic view) I've made it into the quarter final knockout, outplaying a top division 1 team (wasps - 2 star players) this makes me think that the game might actually be too easy and in a month or two that'll be it...so the value for money thing as Big T says doens't really do wonders for the games overall score. What I will try though is to start playing on side view, like you suggestedOriginally posted by BigTen@Feb 17 2006, 04:22 AM
CeeJay,
That is a good point about the rating of the game. But I did say that as a stand-alone game I would have given it an 8/10.
But I stand by the fact that I would give it a 6/10. The reason behind this is because it seems like the same game as '05 but with a few improvements.
When I was playing the game last night - I found that I was losing interest in it. Now I still enjoy the game and it is clearly the best rugby game out at the moment that I have played. I have not played Rugby Challenge yet so cannot compare it to that yet.
I will be playing this game a lot and I do think that it is a good game. I did pay money for this game and as such I expect more for my money than just a rehashed version of 2005 and that is why I gave the game a 6/10. The game scores well in every category except for money-for-value which brings the average score down.