Maverick1987
First XV
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,674
- Reaction score
- 106
Yes, of course, and someone with no access to the most accurate figures can make statements like that, while the rest of us can't argue because neither have we. It's a lovely way to convince yourself you're right, but hardly debate. Now, I've found another source based on registered player numbers, spilt into different categories. You're right, England doesn't have 2 million players registered. It has 1990988. Hence my use of the word approximate. Of course, they're not senior male players, far from it, but I have no real reason to doubt those figures, and "It's a joke" isn't likely to change that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rugby_union_playing_countries
Imo playing numbers mean nothing . As you can see from your reference only 130,000 out of 2 million are senior males which is probably about 7% or so . For some reason there's not a lot of kids that continue playing into the senior ranks