- Joined
- Jun 22, 2016
- Messages
- 6,502
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Interesting to read the English union voicing concerns about other countries (i.e. Scotland, Wales and Ireland) pinching players via eligibility rules over parentage, that the RFU and/or English clubs have invested in.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/england-ask-world-rugby-help-13796209
This was shortly after the SRU made an announcement about expanding their resources to proactively pursue players from other countries.
I support the English union on this and was pretty much disgusted to see that the Scottish Union have recently appointed three full time staff to scour the English leagues for English born lads, many of whom have never set foot in Scotland, but who might have Scottish grandparent. I think the English statement can be seen as a direct response to the increased efforts of their neighbours and it in no way reflects badly on the English union to voice concern about this.
The SRU whimper on (in the toe curling video above) about being a "small nation" (bigger than New Zealand) with "a limited number of players" (whose fault is that?). Well, maybe if they had spent the last half century trying to spread the game across social and geographic areas rather than limiting it to the same old private schools and ex-pats they would have more talent to choose from. Despite some improvement in nurturing Scottish born talent (which is bearing fruit in the last couple of years at senior level) the SRU do make it so very easy for me to support Italy*!
I hope something is passed that provides compensation and creates a disincentive for ripping the proverbial out of eligibility rules by channelling more and more resources towards poaching players that you haven't lifted a finger to develop yourself. There is a world of difference between having a Scottish qualified player make contact with you, and going out of your way to systematically trawl players of different age groups from other countries and offer them incentives to jump ship to your union.
*yes, Italy are terrible at poaching players, but they haven't been at the forefront of the sport for 150 years, so I am less judgemental of them.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/england-ask-world-rugby-help-13796209
This was shortly after the SRU made an announcement about expanding their resources to proactively pursue players from other countries.
I support the English union on this and was pretty much disgusted to see that the Scottish Union have recently appointed three full time staff to scour the English leagues for English born lads, many of whom have never set foot in Scotland, but who might have Scottish grandparent. I think the English statement can be seen as a direct response to the increased efforts of their neighbours and it in no way reflects badly on the English union to voice concern about this.
The SRU whimper on (in the toe curling video above) about being a "small nation" (bigger than New Zealand) with "a limited number of players" (whose fault is that?). Well, maybe if they had spent the last half century trying to spread the game across social and geographic areas rather than limiting it to the same old private schools and ex-pats they would have more talent to choose from. Despite some improvement in nurturing Scottish born talent (which is bearing fruit in the last couple of years at senior level) the SRU do make it so very easy for me to support Italy*!
I hope something is passed that provides compensation and creates a disincentive for ripping the proverbial out of eligibility rules by channelling more and more resources towards poaching players that you haven't lifted a finger to develop yourself. There is a world of difference between having a Scottish qualified player make contact with you, and going out of your way to systematically trawl players of different age groups from other countries and offer them incentives to jump ship to your union.
*yes, Italy are terrible at poaching players, but they haven't been at the forefront of the sport for 150 years, so I am less judgemental of them.