:bravo:
-
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Goal should have 2 bars
- Thread starter sigesige00
- Start date
:bravo:
This is getting ridiculous!!!
Why is this asshole still on this forum??? You can be banned for repetitive trolling right???
Why is this asshole still on this forum??? You can be banned for repetitive trolling right???
TBH , I prefer this kind of trolling rather ones that are abusive and try to get a rise out of people.
Yeah, but it is still Trolling. it seems to me that this retard is getting special treatment, because the Mods maybe feel he is entertaining. But nonetheless, I rate him in the same category as Cave Dweller.
Interesting theory - but we only ban people for breaking the forum rules. It's not abusive - it's not really spam - it's not really our job to tell people they can't make suggestions (as annoying as some of us may find it). We didn't ban big ginger 8 for the 1000's of "XV's threads". We don't even know if it is trolling - he may just be interested in knowing peoples opinions on his ideas.
If it is really annoying you - I believe the forum does have an ignore feature.
InsaneAsylum
First XV
have you ever considered that you may also receive special treatment because the mods feel you are entertaining?
have you ever considered that you may also receive special treatment because the mods feel you are entertaining?
Nah, i have had my fair share of PM warnings if i stepped over the the line. And I TRY to correct it. This guy however just keeps on going. BG8 has also stopped with his best XV threads, but that however did bring out a positive contribution to the thread. This guy is just entertaining to some because he is rubbing most on the forum the wrong way and he doesn't stop. That to me is the definition of trolling.
Any place that has more than 1 bar is good. Just as long as said bar stocks Thatchers and/or SA Gold
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 22,664
- Reaction score
- 10,958
Cave Dweller, he was a decent troll to be fair to the man.
Sige is the man though, I reckon he's Sepp Blatter's brother.
Sige is the man though, I reckon he's Sepp Blatter's brother.
Last edited by a moderator:
sigesige00
Bench Player
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 821
- Reaction score
- 72
Please understand that I am thinking seriously. I am suggesting higher bar because too-high balls are difficult to judge. Therefore I am suggesting 18m bar. Since I have never seen a kick over 18m, there will be no problem.
- Joined
- May 28, 2010
- Messages
- 10,373
- Reaction score
- 4
He isn't breaking any rules or having a pop at anybody.
I see no issue with this. I find it funny as hell to be honest, more to do with the others reactions.
Any issues can be brought to the attention of myself or any other mods.
Is she... is she... hot?
I see no issue with this. I find it funny as hell to be honest, more to do with the others reactions.
Any issues can be brought to the attention of myself or any other mods.
Is she... is she... hot?
I wouldn't say no - but it's been a rough couple of months...
dasNdanger
First XV
Why not just have an infrared [FONT=arial, sans-serif]net between the posts with alarms that go off when the beams are broken? Mebbe with little red flashing lights at the top of the posts, something like they have for goals in hockey.
das[/FONT]
I fully disagree. sigesige00 is one of my favourite posters. Every time I see a new thread from him, I laugh before I've even read it. Then I read it and laugh some more. Even his saner ideas become funny because it's sige. He gets me every time. Then the sarcastic responses. Then the responses telling him he's an idiot. And the fact that he never responds, except to contribute more ideas. My favourite post of his was when he said that he's realised that some of his ideas were wrong.
*I say he, may well not be a he.
I also love XV's. Nothing beats taking the time to complete a rugby team, contrasting styles of players and ideas and trying to pull them all together. Something special would leave the forum if we got rid of XVs.
So for the first time, I've brought together...
...
...
...
... the sigesige00 silly ideas XV!!!
1. Cancel the 2019 World Cup
2. Colour of head gears should be the same
3. Cancel the scrum, replace with free kick
4. Automatic 22m advance in case of PK
5. Abolish kick-off, introduce RL's "play the ball"
6. Rugby field should have 68m*105m
7. Rugby field should have 68m*120m
8. There should be 11 substitutes
9. Free kicks should be worth 1 point
10. Goal should have 2 bars
11. 1 suicide point for carrying the ball back over the tryline
12. Abolish bonus points
13. A win for the team who has scored more tries
14. 8 team World Cup
15. RU World Cup should be 32 teams
sigesige00
Bench Player
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 821
- Reaction score
- 72
Well, I have understood that I was wrong on many points.
1. I am against having a World Cup in Japan, because Japan is a racist state in which Korean Schools are openly under racist repression by the government. The 2019 World Cup should be in Europe or Oceania.
2. I see nothing wrong about my point.
3. I do not like scrum, because there are too many collapsings, time-consuming, dangerous, and damage turf pitch.
4. I see nothing wrong about it. I think this would reduce the number of fouls.
5. I was wrong on this point.
6 and 7. In many countries, there are not enough number of Rugby stadiums. So Rugby is very often played in Athletic stadiums or Football stadiums. So the field whose size is same as Football is good for international spreading.
8. I see nothing wrong about increasing the number of subs. And substitutions must be unlimited except players who received red card or in sinbin. Substitution can be done without stopping play, like Hockey, Ice Hockey, Futsal.
9. I thing this is not a bad idea. If the value of a kick is only 1 point, there will not be many attempts, like there are not many DG attempts in Rugby League since DG is only 1 point. So if 1 point can be scored from an FK, attempts would be only in the situation of tie score in the last 10 mins.
10. Please discuss in that thread.
11. I think that this is a good idea. And 1 suicide point for being tackled in ingoal.
12. I think that abolition of bonus point is very correct. There is no necessity for such rule, because there is point difference.
13. I proposed that ONLY IN THE CASE OF DRAW. Particularly in the knock-down system competition, this rule is necessary I think.
14. I was thinking about something like enlarged 6-nations. But I was wrong.
15. 32-team World Cup might be too early.
1. Japan racist? Because of something involving Korean schools? Aren't Koreans and Japanese the same race? That would make them xenophobic at best .
2. Color of the head gear should be the choice of the players or the clubs. Easy.
3. The scrum is one of the core aspects of the game. Remove the scrum and we won't be needing hookers and props. It destroys the whole dimension of the game we all love.
4. There is a 10 m. advance if players start yapping against the ref. That's enough. A penalty kick should be taken on the spot of the infringement. With that PK, you can gain territory yourself by making the right decisions.
5. Great!
6 and 7. By changing the size of the field, you have to take into account changing the specific territorial areas, meaning the 22m-area will no longer be a 22m-area. The midway point of the field is 50 m. from both try lines. Perfect!
8. This one, I have to agree with you there. Maybe not increasing it to 11, but across the globe, bring 1 or 2 extra spots so we can replace both props and have 1 more for the back-line. 11 subs is too much though.
9. So you can only convert a FK into a point in the final 10 minutes? Bullsh*t idea, sorry.
10. Why 2 bars?
11. Like a safety in NFL? Not a bad idea. Make it 2 points, but give the attacking team the decision to either take the 2 safety points or take a 5 m. scrum to go for a try
12. No. BP's make games interesting with mere minutes to go.
13. Maybe 1 extra point, but that's almost the same as a 4-try bonus point.
14. Weel, then say so. Add Georgia and Romania to the existing 6 Nations if you want to increase the 6N.
15. We can hardly get a competitive tournament with 20 teams. I rather see them introduce the cup/plate/bowl/shield format so the lower tier teams can play each other in the later stages, in the long run improving their level of intensity.
2. Color of the head gear should be the choice of the players or the clubs. Easy.
3. The scrum is one of the core aspects of the game. Remove the scrum and we won't be needing hookers and props. It destroys the whole dimension of the game we all love.
4. There is a 10 m. advance if players start yapping against the ref. That's enough. A penalty kick should be taken on the spot of the infringement. With that PK, you can gain territory yourself by making the right decisions.
5. Great!
6 and 7. By changing the size of the field, you have to take into account changing the specific territorial areas, meaning the 22m-area will no longer be a 22m-area. The midway point of the field is 50 m. from both try lines. Perfect!
8. This one, I have to agree with you there. Maybe not increasing it to 11, but across the globe, bring 1 or 2 extra spots so we can replace both props and have 1 more for the back-line. 11 subs is too much though.
9. So you can only convert a FK into a point in the final 10 minutes? Bullsh*t idea, sorry.
10. Why 2 bars?
11. Like a safety in NFL? Not a bad idea. Make it 2 points, but give the attacking team the decision to either take the 2 safety points or take a 5 m. scrum to go for a try
12. No. BP's make games interesting with mere minutes to go.
13. Maybe 1 extra point, but that's almost the same as a 4-try bonus point.
14. Weel, then say so. Add Georgia and Romania to the existing 6 Nations if you want to increase the 6N.
15. We can hardly get a competitive tournament with 20 teams. I rather see them introduce the cup/plate/bowl/shield format so the lower tier teams can play each other in the later stages, in the long run improving their level of intensity.
