National Rugby Championship Launched

[RoosTah]

So it's official, the new NRC has been launched, with the teams and rule changes all formalised:

BUILDCORP NATIONAL RUGBY CHAMPIONSHIP LAUNCHED

8/13/2014
By ARU Media Unit

Nine teams. Four states and one territory. Eighteen venues. A free-flowing, tough, attractive game that will connect with the heartland of Australian Rugby. This is the Buildcorp National Rugby Championship.
This is Australian Rugby Unleashed.

The 2014 Buildcorp National Rugby Championship season was officially launched at Coogee Oval in Sydney today (13 August) attended by players and Head Coaches of the nine competing sides – Brisbane City, Queensland Country, Macquarie University North Harbour Rays, Sydney Stars, Greater Sydney Rams, NSW Country Eagles, University of Canberra Vikings, Melbourne Rising and Perth Spirit.

Australian Rugby Union CEO Bill Pulver and Buildcorp Managing Director Tony Sukkar were also present.
The inaugural Buildcorp NRC will run for 11 weeks, kicking off with the season-opener next Thursday, 21 August when Brisbane City takes on the Sydney Stars in a classic Queensland-NSW cross-border clash at Ballymore in Brisbane.

Today's official launch coincides with the announcement of the law variation and interpretation changes that will be implemented in the inaugural season of the Buildcorp NRC.
Earlier this year, Rugby fans were asked to suggest law variations that could be trialled in the first year of the Buildcorp NRC, a process which saw a staggering 600+ suggestions come in from right across Australia.

These suggestions were reviewed and shortlisted by a panel of Australia's leading Rugby minds, including former Wallabies coach Bob Dwyer, former international Rugby referee Wayne Erickson, former Wallaby and current FOX SPORTS commentator Rod Kafer and Qantas Wallabies coach Ewen McKenzie.
In determining which law variation and interpretation changes should be considered for inclusion in the Buildcorp NRC, the ARU took into account votes from more than 6,000 fans, the opinions of key stakeholders such as the

Rugby Union Players' Association (RUPA) and feedback from online forums such as The Roar and Green and Gold Rugby.
Overwhelmingly, the most popular suggestion was a change to the points system.

The Buildcorp NRC will implement a points system that reduces points for penalty goals and drop goals to two and increases the points for a conversion goal to three, while tries will continue to be worth five points. This law variation has been approved by the International Rugby Board.

Other popular law interpretation and competition changes that will be trialled are:
· Being able to kick to touch and continue with a line out if a team is awarded a penalty after time has expired.
· Time limits for scrum formation and kicks at goal.
· Instead of four-try bonus point system, the winning team is awarded a bonus point for finishing three or more tries ahead of their opponents.

A host of other law interpretation changes will be trialled in the 2014 Buildcorp NRC, all of which have the underlying aim of enhancing exciting play and reducing stoppages, while maintaining the fabric of the game (see attached factsheet for more detail).

Bill Pulver said he was keen to see the Buildcorp NRC deliver a brand of Rugby that is exciting to play and entertaining to watch.

"While maintaining the integrity of the game, we want to see a more creative style of Rugby being played where risk and attack are rewarded."

"We also want to see more continuous play and less time wasted.

"Involving fans in this process has been a terrific way to re-energise the passionate Rugby fan base and ensure the Buildcorp NRC has the interests of Rugby supporters at its core."

The Buildcorp NRC is also an important strategic development for the growth of Rugby in Australia – helping to develop elite players, coaches and match officials.

"The competition represents the missing link in the development pathway towards Super Rugby, and ultimately Wallaby selection," Mr Pulver said.

"With almost 300 Rugby players involved, including current and former Wallabies, Super Rugby players and emerging talent from Club Rugby, the Buildcorp NRC presents a real opportunity for young Rugby players to move up through the ranks.

"I'm sure every fan of Rugby in Australia will be keen to watch high-quality Rugby in what has previously been a dormant period of the year on the domestic scene.

"All fit Super Rugby players not in Ewen McKenzie's Qantas Wallabies squad will play in the Buildcorp NRC, giving fans a wonderful opportunity to see some of Australia's best players at their local grounds.

"I encourage all fans throughout the country to get on board with a team and show your support by attending games throughout the season."

Buildcorp Managing Director Tony Sukkar said the partnership was a fantastic opportunity for Buildcorp, as the competition takes the company's long-term sponsorship of grass roots rugby to a national scale.

"We are proud to be supporting this important new tier of Australian Rugby and look forward to watching the next generation of Super Rugby and Wallaby players emerge over the course of the competition."

The opening round will see Brisbane City host the Sydney Stars (Thursday 21 August); Perth Spirit will make the trip east to take on the University of Canberra Vikings (Saturday 23 August); NSW Country Eagles will host the Greater Sydney Rams (Saturday 23 August); and Melbourne Rising will play the Macquarie University North Harbour Rays at AAMI Park (Sunday 24 August).

Fans of Rugby in regional NSW will see their heroes in action in round four, with the NSW Country Eagles entertaining Brisbane City at Oakes Oval in Lismore (Sunday 14 September). A week later, the NSW Country Eagles will host Melbourne Rising at Wade Park in Orange (Saturday 20 September).

Perth Spirit will be taking one of their home fixtures interstate when they play the Greater Sydney Rams in South Australia at Adelaide Airport Stadium (Saturday 6 September).

Queensland Country, meanwhile, will take their fixtures right across the State. Steve Meehan's side plays NSW Country Eagles at Bond University on the Gold Coast (Saturday 30 August) and will play Sydney Stars at Mike Carney Toyota Park in Townsville (Saturday 11 October).

Tickets and membership packages are now available from each of the individual NRC teams' websites. For links to each of the team websites – visit rugby.com.au/NRC.

FOX SPORTS is the exclusive broadcaster of the Buildcorp NRC and will deliver live coverage of one match from each round of the competition in a dedicated Thursday night timeslot at 7.30pm. The NRC 'Match of the Round' will be followed by FOX SPORTS Rugby entertainment show Rugby HQ at 9.30pm.

All NRC teams will be broadcast across the first five weeks of the Buildcorp NRC (either home or away). FOX SPORTS today confirmed the broadcast matches for rounds six to eight, which will see Melbourne, Sydney and Canberra host broadcast matches in the second half of the competition.

http://www.rugby.com.au/News/NewsAr...ORP-NATIONAL-RUGBY-CHAMPIONSHIP-LAUNCHED.aspx

I have to say this took me by surprise: "The Buildcorp NRC will implement a points system that reduces points for penalty goals and drop goals to two and increases the points for a conversion goal to three, while tries will continue to be worth five points."

I'm in support of the first part, but why change conversions to 3? Doesn't make sense to me. Reducing penalties to 2 already makes them worth less than a third of a converted try already, so why make conversions worth 3? I'd have kept it a uniform 2 for all kicks.

 

[TRF_stormer2010]

That precise point system is used in SA in the Varsity Cup competition. I had my doubts as well but I have to admit it has seen a very positive game. BUT we have two things in the Varsity Cup that complement that;

- refs are insanely hard up on the tackler's releasing and rolling away immediately and give yellows much more readily than you'd see in test or pro club rugby for spoiling tactics. I wouldn't say they discourage competition at the ruck but the opposition certainly need to be mindful of staying within the laws.
- the captains each have one TMO referal per half to question ref decisions. If the the ref decision is overturned the captain retains that referal. This sounds silly, I know, but the positive spins offs are that ref's almost never go to the TMo and back themselves so the action keeps up while the onus is more on the captains to make the referal and having only one they only use it if they KNOW for a fact that for instance there was a knock on or whatever in the lead up to an opposition try and the fact that they can get poor decisions or simply where the ref missed something overturned just makes for a fairer match overall.

 

[RoosTah]

That precise point system is used in SA in the Varsity Cup competition. I had my doubts as well but I have to admit it has seen a very positive game. BUT we have two things in the Varsity Cup that complement that;

- refs are insanely hard up on the tackler's releasing and rolling away immediately and give yellows much more readily than you'd see in test or pro club rugby for spoiling tactics. I wouldn't say they discourage competition at the ruck but the opposition certainly need to be mindful of staying within the laws.
- the captains each have one TMO referal per half to question ref decisions. If the the ref decision is overturned the captain retains that referal. This sounds silly, I know, but the positive spins offs are that ref's almost never go to the TMo and back themselves so the action keeps up while the onus is more on the captains to make the referal and having only one they only use it if they KNOW for a fact that for instance there was a knock on or whatever in the lead up to an opposition try and the fact that they can get poor decisions or simply where the ref missed something overturned just makes for a fairer match overall.

Those are interesting points Stormer. I had imagined that the reduction of the value of penalties would require refs going to the pocket a bit to be honest, but the idea of a challenge is actually really quite smart in terms of preserving flow.

 

[welshglory]

I wonder if reducing the current sin bins to 5 mins or introducing a completely new sin bin for professional fouls would be an idea. So instead of the current situation where the refs are basically scared to give yellow cards there would be less pressure on them.

 

[smartcooky]

So it's official, the new NRC has been launched, with the teams and rule changes all formalised:



I have to say this took me by surprise: "The Buildcorp NRC will implement a points system that reduces points for penalty goals and drop goals to two and increases the points for a conversion goal to three, while tries will continue to be worth five points."

I'm in support of the first part, but why change conversions to 3? Doesn't make sense to me. Reducing penalties to 2 already makes them worth less than a third of a converted try already, so why make conversions worth 3? I'd have kept it a uniform 2 for all kicks.

Making the the conversions three points does three things

1. Keeps the intrinsic value of goal-kicking
2. Makes the value of a converted try = four penalty goals
3. Restores the relative value of the conversion as part of the converted try. It used to be 2/5 (40%) in the three point try days, now it will be 3/8 (37.5%). Very close

I also like the scrum penalty thing they are doing where a penalty awarded for a scrum infringement cannot be kicked at goal (although it can still be kicked for touch with a gain in ground and retaining the throw for the kicking team). What I hope this will result in is that teams will go back to what the Law intends, i.e that scrummaging once again becomes a means to restart the game with a contest for the ball, not a means of trying to force the opponents (or con the referee) into giving up a kickable penalty.

 

[Patchey]

Seems like a really well thought out, positive set of rules changes. I was a bit skeptical when I first heard the NRC would have be experimenting but not so now. Bumping up the conversion value is a great move IMO, as it really compliments the reduction of points of a penalty (as smartcooky has already pointed out).

My only query would be how this is going to tie in with the idea of the NRC helping with rugby development. Young players who spend a few seasons with an NRC team then step up to Super Rugby are going to have learnt to play the game in subtly different ways. Similarly players from Super Rugby franchises who aren;t internationals and play in the NRC will end the Super Rugby season and have to move to a competition with different rules.

Long term I can see a lot of these changes spreading throughout the game though, presuming they're successful, so maybe it isn't much of an issue.

 

[TRF_stormer2010]

I wonder if reducing the current sin bins to 5 mins or introducing a completely new sin bin for professional fouls would be an idea. So instead of the current situation where the refs are basically scared to give yellow cards there would be less pressure on them.

I think that is a brilliant idea in line with the thinking behind these rule changes. Less impactful sin binng but more readily handing out yellows would negate the potential abuse of negative tactics to slow down opposition ball since 2;8 is a lot more likely to draw out illegal play than 3;7.

The added benefit is that a 50/50 or straight out poor yellow decision is also less impactful on the result.

Seems like a really well thought out, positive set of rules changes. I was a bit skeptical when I first heard the NRC would have be experimenting but not so now. Bumping up the conversion value is a great move IMO, as it really compliments the reduction of points of a penalty (as smartcooky has already pointed out).

My only query would be how this is going to tie in with the idea of the NRC helping with rugby development. Young players who spend a few seasons with an NRC team then step up to Super Rugby are going to have learnt to play the game in subtly different ways. Similarly players from Super Rugby franchises who aren;t internationals and play in the NRC will end the Super Rugby season and have to move to a competition with different rules.

Long term I can see a lot of these changes spreading throughout the game though, presuming they're successful, so maybe it isn't much of an issue.

In SA, the varsity cup is the tournament many of our young SR and Bok players went through, guys the age of Etzebeth, Kolisi etc would've had 1 year with these rules (if I'm not out by a year, not sure now) but a guy like Pollard'd have a few. If anything I think they are more skillfull than the 'older' generation.

I think Aus are being very clever using this because;
- a higher skilled and fitter player will come from it
- a better spectacle as well just for the sake of spectacle and
- possibly more able to compete in a difficult market with a lot of competition ITO contact ball sports and luring non-traditional spectators

---

On a side note

The 2014 Varsity cup tested out dual on-field referees. I didn't follow the comp this year. Maybe someone else can suggest what the outcomes were of this trial?

 

[RoosTah]

Making the the conversions three points does three things

1. Keeps the intrinsic value of goal-kicking
2. Makes the value of a converted try = four penalty goals
3. Restores the relative value of the conversion as part of the converted try. It used to be 2/5 (40%) in the three point try days, now it will be 3/8 (37.5%). Very close

I also like the scrum penalty thing they are doing where a penalty awarded for a scrum infringement cannot be kicked at goal (although it can still be kicked for touch with a gain in ground and retaining the throw for the kicking team). What I hope this will result in is that teams will go back to what the Law intends, i.e that scrummaging once again becomes a means to restart the game with a contest for the ball, not a means of trying to force the opponents (or con the referee) into giving up a kickable penalty.

Cheers mate, your insights are always interesting.

That said, I actually don't really quite see how point two is reasons for an increase. Currently a converted try = 2.3* of a penalty/drop goal. So why is there suddenly a need for their values to be divisible by rational numbers?

Other than that, I can see what you mean and that actually does make some sense.