Discussion in 'Rugby World Cup 2015' started by The_Blindside, Oct 25, 2015.
Because Owens is always super hot on jacklers going beyond the ball .... NOT.
I think that this is where the problem lies, not all the refs seem to agree. One comes down hard on one thing, another on something else. Not the refs fault really, as the rules are too arcane these days, witness the discussion of the forward pass on the letter to world rugby thread, but you will need a GCSE in physics to understand it!
The overall standard has been poor but I liked Garces at this RWC so far.
As someone else said above, I think refs should be noticed as little as possible, not try to step into the spotlight like Owens constantly does.
British Irish Lions
Now confirmed; with Barnes and Garces as his assistants.
Barnes will undoubtedly be wanting to put his stamp on the game, expect some unnecessary interventions and citings and of course when he's charging down the line when Aussie score, we will see a huge grin on his mug like we did in Auckland, if you subtitled it, it would have read "muahaha".
I don't like Barnes much because he red-carded Dylan Hartley once, and I like Dylan Hartley because he is (was!) our best player - actually I think he is a New Zealander?
I don't mind if the Assistants do their job, and intervene when necessary; they only refer for the ref to decide after all ... hopefully Mr Barnes will be able to police the offside lines a bit better than when he is in the middle.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on how good Wayne Barnes is: I can't see that "the stink" would be any greater than what the French would have kicked up, if Joubert had refffed our quarter final.
Huge shout out for Lacey too and his rapid rise.
... Lucky that both sides are English speaking then isn't it ... I would have been happy with anyone but Wayne Barnes TBH ... not surprising to see a lot of anti-Owens sentiment around though, as most "neutrals" want to see the All Blacks lose anyway, but I can't see how an of his perceived flaws in his refereeing are going to disadvantage the Wallabies.
I saw that on the tube. Hartley was being a grade A pratt but Barnes jeez talk about overreaction.
Im sure someone on here said he's actually welsh but somehow escaped across the border and became an Englishman.
Posted on RWC's website on 8th September, and I quote:
"Referees at the World Cup have been told to take care that scrum-halfs feed the ball in straight so that there is a fair contest between hookers. "
I rest my case.
Well, clearly John Jeffery is telling Referees one thing and WR is espousing another on their website to look good. As how many straight feeds into scrums have you seen, which have led to a proper contest between hookers and refs blowing up and penalising scrumhalved? I've not seen any of the matches I've watched. I can only summise that this is because refs have been given a different direction behind closed doors to get scrums moving and not let too many stoppages/collapses.
The interview with John Jeffery was in the Sunday Times a week before the RWC commenced. I would put a link up, but the Sunday Times is under paid wall.
Want to watch a straight feed and proper hooking? Watch a Japan match.
There was a directive(that's been widely reported) that due to "hooker safety" the scrummie is allowed his left arms to be the centre of the scrum. Then Japan proved that was complete nonsense.
Oh, I wasn't doubting you. The whole thing smacks of hypocrisy to me though.
Japan feed the ball crooked and use foot up at scrum just like any other side does.
Exactly. The only video I can find of straight feed and proper hook is found at following link:
Scroll down to 4. What's gone wrong with the scrum? The Brian Moore video and go to about 40 seconds. None of the matches I've seen, including Japan, have any of the feeds into the scrum been anywhere near this straight. The scrum half has either fed it in crooked or straight under their hooker's foot, thus not allowing a contest of the ball by the other hooker.
Straight feeds into the scrums have been a bit of a bug bear of mine for some time actually; lineout throws get policed for not being down the middle, the passing of the ball in general play gets policed for forward passing, but scrum feeds don't. I think the last time I saw a penalty for one was Tawera Kerr-Barlow, pre his injury, but that was farcical, due to the fact that all 9's do it with impunity. Mind you, I can't see that a crooked feed is any worse than a straight feed with a spin on it to put it under your hooker's feet.
In summary, if your going to police it, fantastic, but police it consistently and fairly, not just every now and again.
Think this is one for @smartcooky.
How straight is straight?
20.6.d - The scrum half must throw in the ball straight along the middle line, so that it first touches the ground immediately beyond the width of the nearer prop’s shoulders.
Once it hits the ground though sound like it's fair play what does next. I mean the way the rugby ball is thrown means trying to get it absolutely straight is bloody hard work so there must be some margin of error.
There is an illustration showing the SH holding the ball by the ends, thus rolling it in such a way that spin won't deviate it.
The convention is that some part of the ball has to be on the centreline.
Some "back of the envelope" triginomentry tells us that the ball can be fed up to about 8Â° squint and still be considered straight.
[TEXTAREA]Law 20.6 (b) The scrum half must hold the ball with both hands, with its major axis parallel to the ground
and to the touchline over the middle line between the front rows, mid-way between knee
Clever scrumhalves know how to deliver the ball in such a way that it will bounce slightly towards his own side. They do this by dropping their left hand slightly on release so that the ball lands more towards the point of the ball on the left, resulting in it taking a slight bounce to the right. It takes a lot of practise to get this right and it is very difficult, if not impossibe to detect because the scrumhalf only drops his hand at the last moment before release. You can liken it to watching (at normal speed) a good blackjack dealer dealing "seconds"; no matter how closely you watch his hands you cannot see him doing it.
Separate names with a comma.