- Joined
- Jan 16, 2020
- Messages
- 7,713
- Reaction score
- 4,155
I'm pleased we're not completely shafting ourselves from a player pathway point of view. Only half shafting ourselves instead. Like shooting yourself in the dick instead of the head.
Apparently the URC opposed the drop to 2.Cop out at all levels by the WRU.
Should have stuck to their guns on 2 teams.
Ideally no club affiliation, just top 70 players available get a contract.
The current clubs would drop into a much more competitive SRC.
It would also allow them to set up friendlies with Prem clubs.
www.bbc.co.uk
I'm pleased we're not completely shafting ourselves from a player pathway point of view. Only half shafting ourselves instead. Like shooting yourself in the dick instead of the head.
Well sort of.No club affiliation? So east wales playing in Cardiff in Blue?
West wales playing at PYS in red?
Have to completely disassociate from previous clubs.Well sort of.
How about
Cardiff Dragons playing in Red, Black and white.
Swansea Bay TSUNAMI playing in white, mauve and sky, (like the City Region)
Well sort of.
How about
Cardiff Dragons playing in Red, Black and white.
Swansea Bay TSUNAMI playing in white, mauve and sky, (like the City Region)
So we finally know! Dragons really need to start winning to justify them staying, because it's difficult when they barely win..
No idea how you go about merging, or deciding which of the Ospreys ans Scarlets stay. Makes more sense to base the side in Swansea, but what then happens to PyS? I don't personally care about the 'history' stuff that Scarlets fans spout, as that's Llanelli RFC's history, not Scarlets.
I'd personally prefer to see a brand new team set-up, but can understand why keeping one of the existing entities would be sensible too. Attendances are poor at both though, so it's not an ideal starting base.
Edit. The issue with the 3 team solution, East, Capital. and West, as they've framed it, is how can it be fully justified. I think a 2 team solution can be better justified as then you've got proper East and West teams. Calling Cardiff the capital side is just a bit of a cop out with its proximity with Newport. Also Dragons have done the least of the 4 on the field to justify their survival above Ospreys and Scarlets.
Imo, the 2 region option was the chance at true revolution, whearas the 3 regions still alienates a big percentage of fans, but won't free up the resources to truly bring about change. This decision feels more like the incremental decline that Dirty Harry has been preaching about.
It could also be a merger between Os and Cardiff, with 'central' being those pathways.Clear to me that it will be the following
1. One team in Swansea playing at St Helens
2. One team in Cardiff playing at the Arms Park
3. One team in Newport playing at Rodney Parade.
Apparently the URC need to agree it. They will want another team to fill the conference. I imagine the South Africans will try to shoehorn the Cheetahs in.
Geographically that would make a lot of sense, but it leaves two pretty weak teams in East and West.It could also be a merger between Os and Cardiff, with 'central' being those pathways.
Gwent is already a huge pathway (it's not just about success it's about playing numbers/pathways) and scarlets at PYS (much better than St Helens) would be west and north as it pretty much is now.
Strong rumour that Y11 (O's owners) looking to buy Cardiff so it's possible. Or O's vanish entirely leaving scarlets to pick up the O's pathway.
I agree about the gwent pathways professional player numbers, they have some really good rugby thriving areas with what I understand have positive playing numbers. If there's genuine investment in coaching and the pathway itself it's likely wise to keep something in the true east. Monmouth, Caerphilly, Newport all have some rugby hotbeds. I get the sense some of the players coming through that pathway have been let down by the issues at the pro end.Geographically that would make a lot of sense, but it leaves two pretty weak teams in East and West.
I know the Gwent pathway is big, but it hasn't been producing many international quality players, and Scarlets are looking worse currently. Cardiff and Ospreys are currently producing the vast magority of the players, so merging them possibly wouldn't be ideal from a player pathway side.
I suppose one of the aims of this restructuring is too address the pathways, so maybe this can be ignored with the hope it improves in East and West going forwards. But I'm still not at all convinced that Llanelli is big enough to support a truly successful region drawing big crowds, even including some of the surrounding towns/villages like Ammanford and Carmarthen. Not when Swansea is right next door.
So, there is left the only choice.Its a nice idea, but 90% of the Dragons and cardiff sesson ticket holders i speak to will relinquish i think. Certanly the section at Cardiff im in we havnt found a person who will renew their ticket, well there is one but i think hes all bulster.
Its hard enough now, every blwdi game 7.45 on saturday nights, cant take the kids, first home gamenin day light is boxing day ffs.
Theres a lot of reasons not to go to Cardiff rugby, and its getting harder and harder to justify. Even if fans accepted the 2 team solution, noone in newport qill travel to cardiff and vice versa, no new fans will come through the doors, itll just be a lesser version of what cardiff have now.
I think people think consolidating to 2 will mean higher quality playing squads, full stadiums, extra funding etc... but that wont be the reality, it will seem fun for those who stay after the fallout for 4/5 years, while squad quality declines, welsh rugby cant afford to keep upping the funding to keep up with the others, and 10 years from now we will be in the exsct same position, except lesser crowds, and much less funds coming in.
Exactly and a true cop out by the WRU.So we finally know! Dragons really need to start winning to justify them staying, because it's difficult when they barely win..
No idea how you go about merging, or deciding which of the Ospreys ans Scarlets stay. Makes more sense to base the side in Swansea, but what then happens to PyS? I don't personally care about the 'history' stuff that Scarlets fans spout, as that's Llanelli RFC's history, not Scarlets.
I'd personally prefer to see a brand new team set-up, but can understand why keeping one of the existing entities would be sensible too. Attendances are poor at both though, so it's not an ideal starting base.
Edit. The issue with the 3 team solution, East, Capital. and West, as they've framed it, is how can it be fully justified. I think a 2 team solution can be better justified as then you've got proper East and West teams. Calling Cardiff the capital side is just a bit of a cop out with its proximity with Newport. Also Dragons have done the least of the 4 on the field to justify their survival above Ospreys and Scarlets.
Imo, the 2 region option was the chance at true revolution, whearas the 3 regions still alienates a big percentage of fans, but won't free up the resources to truly bring about change. This decision feels more like the incremental decline that Dirty Harry has been preaching about.
Think that could be why only 1 team being dropped, as there is not another team ready to step up.Clear to me that it will be the following
1. One team in Swansea playing at St Helens
2. One team in Cardiff playing at the Arms Park
3. One team in Newport playing at Rodney Parade.
Apparently the URC need to agree it. They will want another team to fill the conference. I imagine the South Africans will try to shoehorn the Cheetahs in.
So, there is left the only choice.
Go back to parochial club rugby, with less funding.
The result will be the same... the death of Welsh Rugby.
Talented players will be picked up by French and English clubs, the standard will suffer and the game will die.
Welsh fans have to understand support pro rugby or die.
Well we are in the death throws, theres no expanding once we drop to 3, then 2, then 1, before we are fighting it out with theblikes of Germany in 6 nations 2.
The problem isnt teams, its in the ability to create revenue, and grow with the global game, reducing pro clubs doesnt solve the issue, it just delays the inevitable.
I think the only 2 options that have the tiniest opportunity of a future is to drop to a 12 team welsh league, who unify as 4 regions come european time, or negotiate the entry into the English system.
All 4 welsh teams into the English 2nd tier, with a proper promotion and relegation system to the prem of say 2 per season, and lets have it right out.
I just dont care about 90% of games in the URC, Irish, Scottish teams coming to olay have little travel support, and not particularly interesting, and italian and SA have nothing to offer as a spectacle. Irish and SA teams have the financial muscle to dominate for 50 years, with the odd freak season.
The fact is if we drop to 2 teas we will have to impliment a scottish strategy, ofnidentifying any Welsh qualified players overseas and bring them in en masse to see what makes it.
Its a sad time, we fave extinction
I don't think there is anything wrong with the URC, the Scottish, Irish and Italians are thriving. I think the problem is the way the sport is run in Wales. There is too much money being paid to semi-pro teams. This money needs to be concentrated in the URC team.
All the talk of the Welsh playing in the English pyramid is for the birds. The English will never agree it.
It is the same as me claiming I'm going to shack up with Dakota Johnson, I may really really want it, but she is never going to be interested. I am Wales and Dakota Johnson is England.
Are you a regular attendee at a region? Do yiu enjoy the away fan interaction?