This post is just bizarre to me. I'm not saying that it was a knee to the groin. I've seen the footage and there's not a clear enough angle to tell what has happened there. Based on that footage alone, there's 100% no argument for citing Sexton. BUT. If it was a deliberate knee to the groin, which you seem certain that it was, then obviously he deserves a citing. If he's going out there to hurt the opposition for no reason outside of malice, then he's scum and I'd be furious if he wasn't cited. How could you possibly think that he doesn't deserve a citing for that kind of conduct? People act like rugby being a physical game is a licence for the players to act like thugs. Again, I'm not saying that Sexton actually did this. Honestly, I don't think he did. Based on the footage, he might have inadvertently clipped him while trying to get out of the ruck. I'm not advocating for any kind of citing based on the evidence we've seen. I'm just saying that any player who's deliberately hurting opponents who aren't even on the ball deserves every sanction that comes his way.