Well that was a **** game of rugby (played by the laws of a different game).
Ref might get the law right too might as well give him practice.Winning doesn't matter, might as well try to get it right.
Not rightly, those are the decisions that are wrong by the letter of the law.We don’t though, you see contact above the shoulders all the time and (rightly) nothing is done about it because it’s incidental. The laws are clearly there to prevent neck manipulation or strikes to the head, not someones forearm rubbing against a cheek.
Not rightly, those are the decisions that are wrong by the letter of the law.
Got to agree actually. Had they taken it last week it would have been absolutely fair, but this week...Wales going no.1 off that is a joke, especially with the battering NZ doled out this morning
Wales going no.1 off that is a joke, especially with the battering NZ doled out this morning
**** game. For England it still highlights how the struggle to adapt to a ref who isn't giving them the decisions. Whether he's right or wrong you have to be smarter.
I think Wales were slightly better overall, but considering the teams they might also be more disappointed.
Lol they really didn’t though they pretty much drew an edgy **** game at home where the ref simply couldn’t be assed to apply basic law, then had the cheek to not allow England to quick tap multiple times after....Wales did what they do best. Frustrate and strangle the life out of the opposition.
Anyone injured?
Which makes you absolutely and categorically wrong.
Your point seems to be that England should play to the whistle, whilst simultaneously castigating them for playing to the whistle.