- Joined
- Jul 16, 2016
- Messages
- 2,671
- Reaction score
- 1,161
Imagine being a Bristol fan and finding out this news in this manner... "Upper body injury"No AJ?
Raging
Imagine being a Bristol fan and finding out this news in this manner... "Upper body injury"No AJ?
Raging
Shithole country though, no roofsIf only there was a stadium in America with a roof
Oh wait ...
Ah I've got a few more Jim beams to go .see how long I can be bothered.Right stick a fork in me I'm done.
Me too mare. I vaguely get what they’re saying but I must have seen hundreds of maul tries and I’ve genuinely never seen that given.I'm still confused. He bound to CCS rather than the locks and CCS was not in the maul and so obstruction?
23.46 BST here but I'm not waiting 30mins to maybe play on …Yeah me too. quarter to 2 here. Try and find a version tomorrow and catch up.
Yeah I can't see what was wrong. If it was CCS was ahead of Dombrandt and I don't think that matters anyway, there was no one in a position to tackle anyway.Me too mare. I vaguely get what they're saying but I must have seen hundreds of maul tries and I've genuinely never seen that given.
Not in this game, but Atkinson has given himself a great shout of being at 12 for the AIs. Northmore’s also looked good at 13.So far...with Argentina and this game has anyone played themselves out of The AIs .... anyone played themselves in?
If anything shouldn't it be a long arm transfer call if he's bound to CCS but gets the ball from the player who's been liftedCan't see how that call made sense. Jumper comes down, CCS and dombrandt join the maul from behind the ball carrier and it then gets transferred to dombrandt. The maul then rotates resulting in CCS being ahead of dombrandt but dombrandt breaks away after contact so no obstruction.
If that's obstruction then no mauls can ever rotate around the defence.