• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

USA v England - 19/07/25

If the tmo didn’t spend half an hour fannying about like come on give it don’t give it in the context of the game just made a descision instantly rightly or wrongly.
 
Can't see how that call made sense. Jumper comes down, CCS and dombrandt join the maul from behind the ball carrier and it then gets transferred to dombrandt. The maul then rotates resulting in CCS being ahead of dombrandt but dombrandt breaks away after contact so no obstruction.

If that's obstruction then no mauls can ever rotate around the defence.
 
I'm still confused. He bound to CCS rather than the locks and CCS was not in the maul and so obstruction?
Me too mare. I vaguely get what they’re saying but I must have seen hundreds of maul tries and I’ve genuinely never seen that given.
 
Me too mare. I vaguely get what they're saying but I must have seen hundreds of maul tries and I've genuinely never seen that given.
Yeah I can't see what was wrong. If it was CCS was ahead of Dombrandt and I don't think that matters anyway, there was no one in a position to tackle anyway.
 
Can't see how that call made sense. Jumper comes down, CCS and dombrandt join the maul from behind the ball carrier and it then gets transferred to dombrandt. The maul then rotates resulting in CCS being ahead of dombrandt but dombrandt breaks away after contact so no obstruction.

If that's obstruction then no mauls can ever rotate around the defence.
If anything shouldn't it be a long arm transfer call if he's bound to CCS but gets the ball from the player who's been lifted
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top