Hydrogen is far off and speculative in my opinion. My query about this topic is that with the initial price hike last year we were told an absence of wind (which there was) was a factor in increasing fuel prices and we need to go mad with nuclear. Well, it's been blowing a gale up here consistently for 3 months now and prices still go up by a further 50%, so was that just a load of nonsense? I'm not even that hostile to nuclear.
The UK is so lucky with renewable energy. England reportedly has roughly twice the average wind speed of the continent and Scotland has roughly twice the wind speed of England. Plus the north sea is very shallow which makes installation more feasible (although some turbines now float). Despite the stereotype of British weather there are plenty areas where there is loads of sunlight but the approach to solar energy is piecemeal at best.
The one that frustrates me is the lack of movement on tidal energy. There are four tides a day where enormous quantities of water are shifted by the unstoppable gravitational pull of a giant rock in space. The UK harnesses hardly any of that energy despite having thousands of miles of coastline. Korea leads the way on this but nobody has yet made the major breakthrough.
Oh, and the EU just called burning the remaining finite quantity of a fossil fuel as being 'sustainable'. So it's not just the UK messing things up.
The European Commission says gas and nuclear will act as "transitional" energy sources before renewables become widespread.
www.euronews.com
My only hope is that these soaring energy prices and events in Ukraine focus the minds of those in the corridors of power that the status quo is not an option and energy independence is probably as important a government priority as you can get.