God, it must've been sh!te playing against Lomu
"Ah, he's got the ball again - that's 5pts"
"Ah, they've passed to Jonah....5 more pts"
"Ah, he's got the ball again - that's 5pts"
"Ah, they've passed to Jonah....5 more pts"
Lomu was around 18 stone. They were all between 15.7 and 17 stone. When you're talking that much weight, the odd stone doesn't make any difference (Lomu on peak was around 17.8ish). Also Lomu was quick, but he was nowhere near that fast - Caucau & Joe would kill him him in a straight line. Cohen woud comfortably beat him. Visser and Tuilagi would just about gas him while HMS Banahan (so long as he had an extra 100m to get upto speed first!) wouldn't be far behind.
Full name Robert Fruean
Height 1.90 m (6 ft 3 in)
Weight 105 kg (16 st 7 lb)
Not a winger, but really reminded me of Lomu when I saw him in the ITM this season.
Lomu is/was a bit heavier, but is also a few inches taller
You can always rely on Ranger to take a point, twist it, and then use it for some sort of precious rant.
Lomu was one of the greatest backs to the play the game in my lifetime if not the greatest, not only did he have size and speed he also had what Peat mentioned above - Agility and those 3 things in combination made him and his style of play at the time unique.
The agility is often overlooked but just as important, his ability to change direction and accelerate again stopped him being just a big
"go forward run straight tractor" of a player, instead he was something very special
No one had seen that combination in a back before to such an extent
Its hard to conextualize that now in the fully proffesional era were large wingers/centres are common place.
Lomu was a game changer in every sense of the word
Definitely not. As a wing he doesn't have the highest try scoring ratio; nowhere near and that's not subjective. Nor can anyone claim him to have a wide skillset; kicking, distribution, defense etc.
Yes, he was something special but personally I wouldn't have him in a best ever 15.
So whats your best ever 15?
37 test tries in 63 tests, is better than Bryan Habana's 38 tries in 68 tests or Joost van der Westhuizen's 38 tries in 81 tests. In fact the only people who scored that many tries or over, in similar period, are Jeff Wilson (44 tries in 60 tests), Christian Cullen (46 tries in 58 tests), Doug Howlett (49 tries in 62 tests) and Shane Williams (53 tries in 79 tests). You'd have to rule out David Campese on the same rule, as he scored 64 tries in 101 tests.Definitely not. As a wing he doesn't have the highest try scoring ratio; nowhere near and that's not subjective. Nor can anyone claim him to have a wide skillset; kicking, distribution, defense etc.
Yes, he was something special but personally I wouldn't have him in a best ever 15.
Holy old thread Batman!