Sorry - Below the line = comments under a news articleBTL?
Sorry - Below the line = comments under a news articleBTL?
you still dont answer how exactly that is a provocation other than just accepting russia's pre planned excuse to invade former USSA territories....how...exactly...does one country joining into a DEFENCE agreement....justify a completely different country attacking them....if they dont attack then its all mootThen there were the US and German assurances given to Russia during the early 1990s, and that if Russia withdrew from their Warsaw Pact and accepted German unification, NATO would not move "one inch eastwards." this was a fewnyears before they moved on 3 eastern European countries. So thisnis clear provocation number 1?
I mean we can argue about the level of provocation, but it's clear this was at least 1 step. Obviously as we know Putin rose to power in 99, right after this perceived deceipt.
i think its an apt comparison, 10s/100's of thousands of people are dying, maybe youre not taking things seriously enoughThis is the 3rd time rape has been used as an example on this thread in a situation that has 0 to do with it. I've asked twice before and I'll ask again, can we please not use rape for personal arguing reasons, it's too serious for that!
I get it, I'm not denying reality or anything, I just hate pandering to fuckwits and racists on general principle.Dammed if they do and if they don't. Merseyside Police were critised on review for how little information they released following Southport.
No they shouldn't have to release the information but they are not losing anything by doing so. It won't stop idiots from speculating and some half wits are already saying it's a cover up.
www.bbc.com
I’ve heard this one inch eastward quote before and there seems to be a lot of different things said about it. I’ve heard people saying it was referring to Germany only but at the end of the day it was never ratified in any agreement. If it’s not written down it’s not been agreed has it. Seems a bit silly to use this one single sentence said by one person years ago when said thing was never even agreed.@Kiwiwomble
"you still dont answer how exactly that is a provocation other than just accepting russia's pre planned excuse to invade former USSA territories."
What? There are clear motives and excuses for provocation explained there. Just because you dent them doesn't mean they don't exist.
Let's really simplify it, breaking the agreement of the Warsaw Pact, running unplanned military manoeuvres in Ukraine, US interventions in Crimea, Georgia and then potentially Ukraine, all poking the bear.
But let's say all these things aren't any provocation whatsoever, Baker never mentioned the 'one inch eastward' in context of Russia, and NATOs expansion to basically surround Russia is propaganda.
Let's consider reasons other than this for Russia to feel it's security is under threat, and Putin to feel he's under threat.
On 26 March 2022, Biden, said "For God's sake, this man cannot remain in power."
Bidens actions since the were not one of peacemaker, but one of lacklustre. Trump has also played silly buggers. These actions confirm to me the US had no intention of stopping an invasion, and instead in at least part was happy to watch the situation unfold. The plan seems obvious, keep the war funded and ongoing, keep sanctions pressuring the Russian people until they revolt, and a Yeltsin like west sympathising leader is found.
Look at what some of the US backed NGOs are doing in the region, the constant call for the Russian aligned Assad to be replaced in Syria. Hellnin 2015 right after Putin warned of NATOs involvement in Ukraine the US responded by using the COA to train Ukraine troops in insurgency tactics.
Bit ultimately, from my POV, despite all this evidence of at very least a small provocation, it's the reactions of the US and NATO that lead me to believe provocation was not only there, but was intended.
I genuinely think Putin has fallen into a trap in Ukraine, using Crimea and Georgia as blue prints I thinknPutin took the bait, and is not in a downward slide to his own demise. Noone really wants this war to end, the best scenario for the west is to keep funding Ukraine to destabilise and drain Russian resources, keep the sanctions up, and enjoy the show.
I’ve heard this one inch eastward quote before and there seems to be a lot of different things said about it. I’ve heard people saying it was referring to Germany only but at the end of the day it was never ratified in any agreement. If it’s not written down it’s not been agreed has it. Seems a bit silly to use this one single sentence said by one person years ago when said thing was never even agreed.
Jesus, the UK is a 'racist society'?
I think the conclusion it was a lone madman isn't the issue, it's the conclusion that it ISN'T a lone madman when it's a non-white person and is representative of the entire group is the issue.Without yet knowing the motive and that the police have ruled out terrorism. The main conclusion would be lone madman, the same as Southport.
It would be stupid to say it's political if there was no clear ideology regardless of skin colour.
Similar to Ragey, it's more the conclusions and reactions people and the media gave rather than the actual motive. I can guarantee that 50 year old white men are not going to get more abuse because of this. I can guarantee that after the initial reporting, his race will be barely mentioned.Without yet knowing the motive and that the police have ruled out terrorism. The main conclusion would be lone madman, the same as Southport.
It would be stupid to say it's political if there was no clear ideology regardless of skin colour.
Hence why I said people are stupid.Similar to Ragey, it's more the conclusions and reactions people and the media gave rather than the actual motive. I can guarantee that 50 year old white men are not going to get more abuse because of this. I can guarantee that after the initial reporting, his race will be barely mentioned.
I think Ian is talking to perception more than police conclusion that is being mentioned here as others have said.Without yet knowing the motive and that the police have ruled out terrorism. The main conclusion would be lone madman, the same as Southport.
It would be stupid to say it's political if there was no clear ideology regardless of skin colour.