Originally posted by BigTen@Mar 31 2006, 01:13 AM
It's lucky for Australia that there wasn't an event called "Media Representation of the Games".
Channel Nines's coverage was terrible.
You'd expect a certain amount of bias but they took it to excitingly low depths.
Well with multiple events happening at once ,9 had to make the decision to show what the
Australian public wanted to see...... and half the events were won by Aussies anyway so you cant really blame them for showing the majority of the Australian events.
I heard England was very much the same in there coverage electing to show all British athletes events even if they were in no contention for medals.
If any Australians wanted to watch Cook Islands v Mozambique in the lawn bowls they could have subscribed to the FOX Sports coverage which had 7 dedicated channels playing 24 hours a day with over 1100 hours of live sport.
And also did anyone else think that the Australians protesting, and succesfully getting the English womans 4x400m relay team DQ'd in the final reeked of sour grapes? I mean the English team slaughtered them and the "apparent" breach of the rules was tiny. [/b]
Rules are Rules and the English runner Devonish clearly pushed in front of Lewis to gain the inside lane although i was a little dissapointed with Tamsyn protesting but if the officials had been doing there job she wouldn't of had to.
When the Aussie women won the medaly relay(smashing there own world record) the English 4x100 IM relay team aparently protested after the Libby Lenton jumped out of the pool when the Sri Lankan girl was still yet to finish the race, funny thing is ... if they knew the rules they would have realized that it was perfectly legal.
Hey Big Ten, did an aussie run over your dog or something?