Originally posted by InsaneAsylum@Jul 18 2006, 03:37 PM
???? sure the graphics sucked in 2004....
but rucks actually looked like rucks, not scrums, place kicking had a lot more detail and realism, a drop kick started each half. more stadiums, more teams inc super 12 and european.
... all the players did look like babies though
apparently rugby 2004 unlocked "historic matches" if you completed things in all 3 difficulties ie. beat british isles by 14 points. did anyone ever unlock these? what kind of historic matches could you play?
either way the game is 2-3 years old and has been replaced by much better ea rugby games
Absolutely, the graphics sucked in 2004..... and so did the physics!
Yes 2004's rucks looked like rucks, but 2001 was far beter in terms of a system. Apart from Lomu - that has got to be the best ruck system to date. Also 100 years ago, rucks did look a lot like scrums (a bit of history). I seriously question your next point: firstly you couldn't hook a kick in '04, next the kicking stats really didn't affect the kick as the only thing the metre was used for was power. '01 had a much better system. Clearly, you also don't know that up until 2002 a place kick started each half. And finally what is the point in having more teams, more stadiums, etc when the gameplay is complete and utter shite?? Also money was another problem for Creative Assembly (the creators or World Cup 95 and Rugby 2001).
I assume your babies comment is refering to '04, so I'd have to agree with you there.
Yes, you were meant to unlock some teams and classic matches, but I don't think anyone ever did. I completed the entire set of User Challenges on all difficulties (painfully), and unlocked nothing. I think this was more a rumour that spread from the shoddy cheat websites, where people just made an assumption, that, that was why the Challenges were there.
Either way the game is 2-3 years old now and far better games have been created since, but that certainly wasn't a difficult task. Then again people still play JLR and 2001 don't they?? So time doesn't always destroy a game.............
I'll leave it at that.