C
Canadian_Rugger
Guest
Well longest lockout in NA pro sport history ended NHL is back on with a nice salary cap to boot
Could be funny, I wonder if anyone will bother with him. And Ripper, f*** the Rangers!Originally posted by Ripper@Jul 16 2005, 11:41 PM
Oh great - a freaking Wally wannabe.
When did someone physically abuse the ref or leave the box (I'm assuming that you mean early) to beat the **** out of someone? I honestly don't remember that happening in the NHL for a very long time. What consistant acts? The reason the 04/05 season didn't happen was because the owners and players couldn't agree how to split up $2 billion.Originally posted by M-Time@Jul 17 2005, 03:35 AM
Mate I just think the sport is in danger of becoming irrelevant. When a guy leaves the penalty box to beat the **** out of an opposing player or physically abuse the referee you know something is up. It's always been rough but those kinds of consistent acts are embarrassing. There was a reason the 2004 - 05 season had no players, no fans, no action and no money. It tells you something.
I'm not saying I don't want the sport to be sorted out, because I do. But until then, for all I care it can stay binned.
And thats why they all don't play hockey anymoreOriginally posted by M-Time@Jul 18 2005, 08:26 PM
Gordie Dwyer left the penalty box to fight Washington players and abused the officials all the time. In 2002 Andre Roy left the box and touched up an official while trying to start a fight with players in the New York penalty box. Classy. Then there's Todd Bertuzzi.
Rugby players don't get regular line changes and two breaks per game though.Originally posted by Canadian_Rugger@Jul 18 2005, 06:16 PM
Stanley Cup in my opinion is hardest trophy in sport to win because its techincally almost a second season. 16 teams busting there ass off in 4 best of 7 series to get to the cup. Some teams have had to play 28 games to win the cup thats a 109 games in a season. And rugby players complain about player burnout.
yes this is true but an Ice Hockey shift is so intense. You go out for 1 to 2 minutes and give it your all then u recharge and do it again. The average player will still average 20 mintues with the top players averaging 30 minutes a game. I play both and from experience ice hockey is just as intense as far as burning yourself out goes. Skatinbg is tiring too more so then running.Originally posted by SaintsFan_Webby+Jul 19 2005, 08:37 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SaintsFan_Webby @ Jul 19 2005, 08:37 AM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-Canadian_RuggerRugby players don't get regular line changes and two breaks per game though. [/b]@Jul 18 2005, 06:16 PM
Stanley Cup in my opinion is hardest trophy in sport to win because its techincally almost a second season. 16 teams busting there ass off in 4 best of 7 series to get to the cup. Some teams have had to play 28 games to win the cup thats a 109 games in a season. And rugby players complain about player burnout.
yah I can see your point CRGOriginally posted by Canadian_Rugby_Guy@Jul 19 2005, 01:54 PM
I think it kind of goes both ways, rugby has many more subtleties than hockey does I've noticed (or so it seems). What I mean by this is that hockey is obviously hard, because you're dealing with basically extensions of yourself (i.e. the stick and skates.) whereas if you look at rugby all it looks like is flat line defense, take the ball and run like heck. Now to the trained eye, there is much more to rugby in the independant strategies of each position, the constant evolution of game keeps the players on their toes, and legends like Jonah Lomu don't neccessarily coast through everyone anymore unless they learn how to play in the modern style, even though Lomu revolutionalized play on the wing. Likewise, in hockey there was the use of more equipment allowing the players to be more aggressive. However, even today some of Maurice Richard's records aren't easy to beat. I'm not familiar enough with rugby to know how many records Lomu set, but it does appear that the sport has moved beyond Jonah, and he would have to resort to new tricks to score millions of tries as he has in the past. All this to say, Canadian_Rugger, you're looking at rugby from a Canadian point of view, the fact that people don't play the sport very well compared to the tier one nations doesn't give an adequate view of how tough the game really is, I'm sure me or you would get fried alive if we were placed straight into a game for players our age in NZ, just as half-decent hockey players from some tier two hockey nation would get pulverised here in hockey after seeing it as not so rough. So I'm not sure which is tougher, but I definitely enjoy rugby more, because they don't have stupid parents who like to get into fights.
Judging hockey by Gordie Dwyer and Andre Roy is like judging all rugby players by people like Grewcock who bite. As Canadian Rugger said, Dwyer is a nutjob, and Roy isn't much better.Originally posted by M-Time@Jul 18 2005, 01:26 AM
Gordie Dwyer left the penalty box to fight Washington players and abused the officials all the time. In 2002 Andre Roy left the box and touched up an official while trying to start a fight with players in the New York penalty box. Classy. Then there's Todd Bertuzzi.
good point CRG I think hockey is evolving from the goon mentality. Europe doesn't produce goons and Canada has been slowly changing its style of play from the dump, chase, and hit tactics that used to work so well into a refined game. Hockey is a very aggressive sport and the players are taught to play with tonnes of aggression but I believe hockey is moving away from the goon mentality which once dominated the sport.Originally posted by Canadian_Rugby_Guy@Jul 21 2005, 01:04 AM
I suppose there's somewhat of a North American feeling to it too. I mean if you check out the NFL, CFL, NHL, one thing they have in common is that you feel the aggression coming out of the players, these are also sports about impact when it comes to contact. When I think of soccer or rugby, which are both more European, I think of crazy fans (just like us) and fairly civilised players. Just a thought, of course the way the Bok forwards play all the time could debate my point, but there are exceptions to every rule.