• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

PREM 25/26 - Playoffs

The Rugby Forum - Global Rugby Union News, Six Nations & RWC Discussion

Help Support The Rugby Forum:

Discussion points were make up of the back row and then centres. They are good calls but I really thought they’d start Dingers at 12.

Only Freeman in the Prem team of the season is quite funny, guess it’s picked by that tigers twat.

IMG_8794.jpeg
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Discussion points were make up of the back row and then centres. They are good calls but I really thought they’d start Dingers at 12.

Only Freeman in the Prem team of the season is quite funny, guess it’s picked by that tigers twat.

View attachment 26122
I mean not picked by a Tigers cause Bailey and or Wand would be in it.
Honestly, outside of McParland who would you pick?

Saints seem to have a mixed bag of injuries which prob affected it. But generally speaking, it's been more their game plan than a mixture of standout players. No matter who is playing the saints gameplan works

Saints fans have gotten so salty about this list but then list like 3 players who havn't played over 10 games this season in the prem
 
I'm the opposite I have to try and avoid the Chiefs game score tomorrow so I can watch it at night but absolutely can watch the one tonight.
I’m looking forward to the Exeter game. Just wish we were playing tomorrow instead !
 
I mean not picked by a Tigers cause Bailey and or Wand would be in it.
Honestly, outside of McParland who would you pick?

Saints seem to have a mixed bag of injuries which prob affected it. But generally speaking, it's been more their game plan than a mixture of standout players. No matter who is playing the saints gameplan works

Saints fans have gotten so salty about this list but then list like 3 players who havn't played over 10 games this season in the prem
I agree with you. Wand and Bailey have been the standout players this season.
I’m not salty about it at all !
 
I don't think we win this with Santi at 10 - it was going to be tough enough anyway with Lawrence in his current form (though his selection was inevitable once Santi starts 10, meaning Ojomoh has to start 12)
 
Discussion points were make up of the back row and then centres. They are good calls but I really thought they’d start Dingers at 12.

Only Freeman in the Prem team of the season is quite funny, guess it’s picked by that tigers twat.

View attachment 26122
I mean not picked by a Tigers cause Bailey and or Wand would be in it.
Honestly, outside of McParland who would you pick?

Saints seem to have a mixed bag of injuries which prob affected it. But generally speaking, it's been more their game plan than a mixture of standout players. No matter who is playing the saints gameplan works

Saints fans have gotten so salty about this list but then list like 3 players who havn't played over 10 games this season in the prem

Yeah that is a good point, the list is pretty crappy though in general but my dig was an Healey who had a big hand in writing it.
 
Also what’s up with Bath having the 23 as their extra back row player? Why buck the trend of England and France?
Vaguely remember commentary saying that when they first went to a 6:2 bench they'd already pre-printed numbers on the sub shirts (for the season, maybe?) and the backrowers didn't fit into any of the 21 shirts but did in the 23

Guess they've just stuck with it now as a quirk 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Lording it over the rest of us with your "social lives".
I don’t have one of those but happily Mrs VT does so it’s just me and the dog.

Fish and chips done and dusted and a bottle of something Mrs VT doesn’t like on the go.

Perfect. Now for those Midlanders to serve up a proper dust up.
 
Oof, hugely offside, and would have been played onside if he'd been moving backwards - which he wasn't (and would have been where he was if he had been)
 
Got to ask Dingwall prob isn’t the starter at saints going forward mainly with Litchfield providing the carrier power they have missed in the backs

Does that affect his England standing?
 
Great for Northampton, but another 13. England don't seem to be able to produce 12s
On another note, really great game so far. (Saitns fan so maybe bias but) Great advert for the game so far. Exciting, great attack, but not all harem globe trotters
 
Martin and Chessum in the row for England is a must, Coles at 6.

Backline, must have Freeman at 14, the extra space makes him far more effective. Furbank at 15.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top