Fuzzy du Plessis
Academy Player
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2017
- Messages
- 151
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Sounds like the Fords then. Tbh if his comments about 'individual ego' and 'own agendas' refer to Mike Ford playing him at 6 rather than 12 then it's very harsh from Sam. Even if you disagree with the decision (personally I think he was better suited to 6 - 'phenomenal' at 12 is a massive stretch by Goode) you really can't criticise a coach for playing one of his players in the position he thinks he's best in.
I've seen people saying that Mike didn't want Burgess to look good at 12 to protect George's spot in the England squad, but that doesn't seem right to me. The argument would carry much more weight if it was a choice between Farrell + Burgess or Ford + Farrell but I don't recall that being seriously considered at the time, it was a straight shoot out between Ford and Faz at 10. In any case, if MF's agenda was to keep GF in the England squad then surely the incentive would be to build a solid partnership between him and Burgess?
Would also be more than a touch arrogant if he is saying that the early exit was caused by him not getting enough gametime at 12 with Bath.