• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The refereeing of the 2010 Tri Nations

Also if you read some of the latest post here, newbies will think that all this forum is about moaning about penalty counts ... dear lord please forgive those who have sinned![/QUOTE]

It truly does astound me thats for sure.:euh:Makes me weary about posting without my facts 100% though.
 
Thing is tho ... some people when you read their posts about these types of thing only believe rugby started and that the major rivalries only began in the late 80s. Truth be it that this is certainly not the case. Wales and New Zealand have both had a rich history against each other, albeit in only 27 Test Matches compared the 119 of England. Much rivalry comes from the much famous tour game on the 16th December 1905, when Wales beat the seemingly invincible (although 1924 was that tour) All Blacks 3-0 ... with one of the most controversial tires in the history of rugby.

Yes and Bob Deans was pulled back in that tackle I tell ya :eek:
 
I said they had a great era, not just against the All Blacks though I used the wins they had over some great All Black sides as evidence theres also plenty more-see ezequiel's post. Would you not consider beating the All Blacks 6 times in 4 years a very good effort anyway? or 5 times in 3 years if you take out 03 in which they beat us in a semi final but lost the Bledisloe to us, actually wouldn't they have beaten us twice in 98 as well to win the thing. So it seems you've attempted to manipulate the stats a bit. Either way probably the best era by any country since professionalism began, thats why we have current coaches and players claiming to value the Bledisloe over the 3N. Plus we hate each other anyway


Okay , we looking at this from very different angles. Point taken. I was not attempting to manipulate the stats , simply showing that the win loss ratio was not the awesome cos no I dont think 6/11 is a great result , its a good result but not great as we should aspire to be great. The ABS record against SA post Isolation is great , The Crusaders record in Super rugby is great. Thats the Diffs for me. So to answer you , yes I would consider a 60/40 win ratio as good but not great.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Neither am I, after being married 5 years and having a nearly four year old kid. I don't think anyone ever becomes an expert on women.

Maybe this is something we can all agree on?

Sorry, you have not come up with the only comment everyone on TRF can agree with. Unfortunately there are odd creatures of the female persuasion who are passionate rugby supporters and members of TRF. Whilst I can't say I am an expert on all women I'm certainly an expert at being one :D
 
Sorry, you have not come up with the only comment everyone on TRF can agree with. Unfortunately there are odd creatures of the female persuasion who are passionate rugby supporters and members of TRF. Whilst I can't say I am an expert on all women I'm certainly an expert at being one :D

Right, so that opens the door for me to fire off the classic supporter's sledge

lions%20fan%20yelling%20mears2%2009.jpg

"DOES YOUR HUSBAND
PLAY RUGBY TOO?"
 
IMO...

► The McCaw - Burger incident was nothing.

► The Rossouw - McCaw incident was nothing, but Rossouw acted stupidly in drawing attention to himself by upping the ante and going after McCaw after he got to his feet. If he had let it lie, nothing would have happened.

► de Villiers, Cooper and Fourie all deserved their suspensions. The Law is clear... TIP TACKLES THAT END WITH THE PLAYER BEING DROPPED OR DRIVEN ARE OUT!!! No argument!

► Rene Ranger's tackle was NOT a shoulder charge when you saw the slo-mo, but given that he was penalised, he probably should have been yellow carded. He would not have been suspended afterwards

► Bakkies Botha should have been red carded for the head butt. How did both the referee and the nearside touch judge miss it? Those who say it would not have happened if Cowan had been penalised for the pull back are talking ********; the referee would have played advantage, and Bakkies would have done it anyway. Thugs like Bakkies can't resist getting the filthy cheap shot in any chance they get. In fact, if the referee had seen Cowan and played advantage, he would also have been more likely to be looking at Cowan instead of the ball after he got the ball away, so he would likely have seen the head butt... then bye bye Bakkies!!!

► Tony Woodcock should have got a yellow card. Yes, Fa'ainga was loitering around on the NZ side of the ruck, but what Woodcock did was unacceptable. He could not be cited for reasons I have explained elsewhere, but he certainly should have spent 10 min. keeping the naughty chair warm.


Hi , sorry only saw this now for some reason , agree on all , would like to know what your view is of the shoulder charge of Frank against Juan De Jongh and if the Woodcock incident tell us that maybe the ABS are favored more re foul play ? Or maybe the SA refs are just more lenient ?
 
Hi , sorry only saw this now for some reason , agree on all , would like to know what your view is of the shoulder charge of Frank against Juan De Jongh and if the Woodcock incident tell us that maybe the ABS are favored more re foul play ? Or maybe the SA refs are just more lenient ?

► Franks/De Jong? Which match, the one in Jo-burg? If so, didn't see it. I have the whole game on disk so I can find it if you tell me the approximate game time.

► Why do I think Woodcock wasn't yellow carded? Perhaps Kaplan felt that the game had been clean up until then and he didn't need to up the ante. If the game had been ****ly, perhaps he would have carded Woodcock to cool off any flash-points.

Remember that a yellow card is as much a management tool for the referee as it is a punishment. Referees, especially NH ones, will sometimes give an early yellow card for a first offence if it is blatant or a professional foul. One that comes to mind was the yellow card that Wayne Barnes gave against Scotland vs New Zealand. He binned Nick De Luca in the 3rd minute for playing the ball on the ground after a tackle, where most referees would simply penalise and perhaps warn. That sort of card comes under the heading of "setting your stall out early".
 
► Franks/De Jong? Which match, the one in Jo-burg? If so, didn't see it. I have the whole game on disk so I can find it if you tell me the approximate game time.

► Why do I think Woodcock wasn't yellow carded? Perhaps Kaplan felt that the game had been clean up until then and he didn't need to up the ante. If the game had been ****ly, perhaps he would have carded Woodcock to cool off any flash-points.

Remember that a yellow card is as much a management tool for the referee as it is a punishment. Referees, especially NH ones, will sometimes give an early yellow card for a first offence if it is blatant or a professional foul. One that comes to mind was the yellow card that Wayne Barnes gave against Scotland vs New Zealand. He binned Nick De Luca in the 3rd minute for playing the ball on the ground after a tackle, where most referees would simply penalise and perhaps warn. That sort of card comes under the heading of "setting your stall out early".

It was in the SA / ABS game at Soccer city , I will try and find out when it happened.
 
I remember that and I can't understand why nobody cited Franks who dived into the ruck with his elbow, hitting De Jongh on his face (jaw)!

Anyway I've seen a good referee performance on saturday, only 2 bad calls: the first was a 1st half scrum for SA, reset, but it was clearly penalty against SA front row who has gone upwards to avoid the pressure. Reset, scrum, and Juan Smith try...
Second was holding gave against Beale in the second half (early): Jean De Villiers tackled him and never released him, with new laws it's penalty (as given to Saia Fainga'a after a lineout in the first half).
 
I think the all blacks just have better discipline. And they respond to warnings better.

I mean Look back over the last few years, when was the last time we saw an all black with his fingers in another players eye? or an all black head butting another player? And how often to we see all blacks make lifting "spear" type tackles? Not very often...

There was a Carter High tackle last year? not much in it but it caused a crap storm. Then Have to go back to Brad thorn dumping John Smit a couple of years ago for anything of note. Very unlike Brad and stupid rather than dangerous. Before that we have to go way back to Tana's cleanout on BOD, careless maybe yes intensional? No.

In contrast is anyone ever suprised to see the likes of Burger or Botha when they get in trouble these days? Or to a lesser extent butch james... Not really, with those guys it's just a matter of when rather than if. And the boks only have themselves to blame when the coach backs their actions.

Was actually great to see Jimmy Cowan just laugh it off when Both head butted him. He is one player that can react badly to situations like that, but the way he delt with it was pure class.
 
it was a cowardly ans evil thing to do by Tana he should go to jail.
 
It happens in Rugby. It was sad to see O'Driscoll hurt like he was, he's been at the top in terms of centres for a long time. That was awhile ago now and the tackle was dangerous, was it intentional?...only Tana and Kevin will ever truely know.
 

Latest posts

Top