• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The Ukraine War thread

The Rugby Forum - Global Rugby Union News, Six Nations & RWC Discussion

Help Support The Rugby Forum:

Ukraine already had "robust security guarantees" when they gave up their nukes. They counted for **** all as none of the parties involved were prepared to help.

If Europe and the USA aren't prepared to take military action now when Russia is weakened to help Ukraine, they definitely won't in the future.
Not sure the EU will even agree what to do with the frozen assets. Various nations likely not to agree.
 
Russia asserts with no evidence that Ukraine targeted one of Putin's residences, a claim Ukraine denies. Trump immediately says how angry he is about it.

Ukraine show daily evidence of Russia indiscriminately bombing civilians, Trump doesn't say a word.
 
And how many attempted assassinations of Zelensky?

To paraphrase Bomber Harris:
Russia appears to have started this war under the childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else, and nobody was going to bomb them
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.

Grain dispute reveals bad blood between Ukraine and Israel​

The row over stolen Ukrainian grain also throws light on the strange relationship between Putin and Netanyahu​

A dispute about a ship full of stolen grain has lifted the veil on a geopolitical reality that has persisted for years but is rarely mentioned in western capitals or noticed by western media: the curiously friendly relationship between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took to X to complain that a Panama-flagged ship was preparing to unload 25,000 tonnes of wheat and barley stolen from his country in Haifa, Israel. An investigation by Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz suggests the Panormitis was at least the fifth ship so far this year to carry grain taken from occupied Ukraine to Israel.

"In any normal country, purchasing stolen goods is an act that entails legal liability," Zelenskyy wrote. "This is not — and cannot be — legitimate business. The Israeli authorities cannot be unaware of which ships are arriving at the country’s ports and what cargo they are carrying.”

Ukraine’s government has now filed a criminal complaint in Israel against those it believes to be the buyers of that grain, after its requests for Israeli officials to act were greeted with angry lectures by the Netanyahu government.

[...]

"Russia is systematically seizing grain on temporarily occupied Ukrainian land and organizing its export through individuals linked to the occupiers," Zelenskyy posted on April 28. "Such schemes violate the laws of the State of Israel itself. Ukraine has taken all necessary steps through diplomatic channels to prevent such incidents. However, we see that yet another such vessel has not been stopped."

Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine is preparing a "relevant sanctions package that will cover both those directly transporting this grain and the individuals and legal entities attempting to profit from this criminal scheme."

The European Union backed Ukraine, threatening sanctions of its own.

"We condemn all actions that help fund Russia’s illegal war effort," said EU foreign affairs spokesperson Anouar El Anouni, "and remain ready to target such actions by listing individuals and entities in third countries if necessary."

[...]

"The Russians are playing a very nasty game here," said Pinkas, adding that it should have been a turning point when Iran installed a Shahed drone assembly line in Crimea, but "still Israel didn't take a pro-Ukrainian position."

"I understand that when there's this huge country called Russia not far away and you have 1.2 million Russian speakers, you're circumspect about taking a bold position. But there's no question that it's becoming bizarre how much Israel is in denial over Russian-Iranian co-operation."

There is another factor holding Israel back. Pinkas says Israeli diplomats are also aware that calling out Russia’s behaviour risks drawing attention to the parallels with Israel.

"On what basis should Israel take a position against Russia? If it’s the illegal occupation of land, then Israel itself is going to be blamed for that," he said. "And so Israel kept a low profile."

The same is true of allegations that Russia targets Ukrainian civilians, said Pinkas. Although Israel, unlike Russia, can claim to be responding to an attack, "Israel finds it difficult to stand up to and repudiate Russian actions because they're going to say, 'Whoa, isn't this what you're doing?'"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grain-dispute-reveals-bad-blood-ukraine-israel-9.7191839
 
QC
Which Russian EU assets?
I also don't witness strengthened EU unity when I travel on business to Spain/Italy and Central/E.Europe
 
Protests break out in major cities across Ukraine


Rare protests have broken out in the Ukrainian capital against the dismissal of the country’s defence minister, part of a broader cabinet reshuffle initiated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that has exposed rifts in Ukraine’s military establishment.

Hundreds demonstrated near the Ivan Franko National Theatre in central Kyiv on Thursday against the move to replace Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, who was credited with boosting Ukraine’s drone warfare during his short six-month tenure.

Protesters also rallied in several other cities, including Lviv, Odesa and Dnipro, while in Kyiv, they chanted “Shame!” and carried placards reading “The Russians are celebrating”.

Writing on X, Fedorov said it had been “a great honour to serve the Ukrainian people” as defence minister, before outlining what he described as the ministry’s key achievements during his tenure. They included disabling “Starlink access for Russian forces” and launching programmes to expand Ukraine’s domestic drone production during the ongoing war with Russia.

In comments to reporters, Fedorov criticised military chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, with whom he’s been in dispute with, and questioned whether Ukraine could defeat Russia with him in charge of the army.

“Instead of figuring out how to defeat Russia asymmetrically – which is the commander-in-chief’s task – he figured out how to split the country,” said Fedorov, according to AFP.

Fedorov criticised slow bureaucracy and a lack of flexibility, saying “in this configuration, I personally don’t know how to win the war”.

Advertisement

He also alleged that Syrskyi engineered his removal through an ultimatum issued to Zelenskyy after months of clashes.

A 35-year-old technology specialist, Fedorov was previously Ukraine’s first minister for digital transformation. He is recognised for having streamlined bureaucracy and introduced a more data-driven approach to the war against Russia.

Supporters say Fedorov’s efforts to reform defence procurement and tackle corruption made enemies within parts of the political and military establishment. Critics say he failed to deliver quickly enough on promises to overhaul military recruitment.
 
http://youtube.com/post/UgkxYuJ1D143-L-InsIal1LIL90Dx-ZXnihl?si=hyhQMi31R5iwmR72

We’ve gotten a lot of further details about Fedorov’s dismissal. These details are incredibly helpful. It’s entirely possible to still be very frustrated about this. I’m really sad to see Fedorov go. But Fedorov’s own accounting of what happened should definitely help alleviate the most extreme of concerns. 1. Fedorov confirmed he was dismissed because of deep disagreements with Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief, Syrskyi. These had clearly boiled into actual conflict and a lack of unity among military leadership. 2. In the interest of unity, Zelensky felt compelled to pick either Fedorov or Syrskyi. He made the decision to keep Syrskyi. Nothing indicates this was an easy choice. Actually, given the fallout, we can be almost certain that it wasn’t. 3. Fedorov wasn’t simply ousted. He was offered the role of PRIME MINISTER. Fedorov declined. He was then also offered, but declined, an advisory role. This argues against the idea that Zelensky simply wanted Fedorov gone, or that Fedorov himself was removed for corruption. Zelensky wanted to keep Fedorov’s talents, while putting him in a different area of government that would produce less internal conflict. This is a classic situation that happens all the time, in governments and in all organizations. A young reformer comes in conflict with the old guard, forcing leadership into tough decisions. It’s entirely possible to still disagree with what happened. But there is simply zero evidence here that Fedorov’s dismissal had anything to do with “corrupt elites forcing out the reformer so they could continue to make money.” Which is the narrative I’ve heard being offered everywhere without any substantive evidence to back it up. All in all, I believe Ukraine will get through this, and Ukraine will be just fine. Fedorov was a very important man in a very important position. I’m very sad to see him go. But Ukraine is far bigger than one man. If you want more details, I created a video on the topic yesterday.

I don't know enough about the facts on the ground to weigh in on this. Syrskyi was very popular and given a great deal of credit for the successful defense of Kyiv in the opening months. But Federov is also popular and his reforms since he took office in January of this year have showed some real progress. It is absolutely fair to say that the war has improved for Ukraine in the past six months, and some of that certainly lies at his feet.

I hope that Zelensky is a skilled enough politician to bring these sides together so their working relationship can continue. It is hard to believe that it is in Ukraine's best interests to replace Federov at this moment
 
My thoughts?
I'm biased.
I'm very pro-Russian and anti-Ukranian.
There are historic reasons for this, related to my family and their experiences 1938-46, and I tend to respect the experiences of my Uncles across that period.

I was looked upon by my friends as somewhat eccentric when I stated that the Ukrainian shelling of Russian speaking Ukrainians in E.Ukraine during the summer of 2014 would end up in a bloodbath.
I hate being proven right.
99% culpability lies with EU/NATO/Ukraine

It'll be over soon I hope
 
There are historic reasons for this, related to my family and their experiences 1938-46, and I tend to respect the experiences of my Uncles across that period
What are those historic reasons if not a secret? (I also have some kind of history related to my family in Poland/Western Ukraine/Ukrainian SSR and Russia during same years that's why I'm curious)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top