• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

USA news & politics

Of course he is, the algorithm absolutely tailors extremist content to everyone...

The difference is, he is literally the only descenting voice here, im not into dog piling like you lot, I'll leave the discussion for when there isnt 10 v 1.

Ive countered plenty of issues with him regarding Trump, and I'll counter plenty more, I just have a bit of empathy, while hes calling for a public execution hahaha
You are just like him, you're even using the same right wing rhetoric recently.

I can usually tell the right from the overuse of the word "unhinged" it's another way of trying to belittle people with different views, the other word is "deranged"
 
On a serious note, what kind of leeway will Trump be given going forward by Democrats.

I fully expect him to respond '**** you, but Charlie Kirk' to every criticism, I also suspect you may be right in that he will absolutely clamp on groupd like Antifa (thats a weird sentence, how has that become a thing).

But where does this lie constitutionally, surely theres a first amendment concern. Ive said it before, Republicans are going to be crying when the next Democrat president uses powers that Trump has widened, this may very well be one of those.
The last paragraph is one thing I agree with you there
 
In Kirk's defence he was a relatively calm and solid debater, he didn't rant and rave as others did/do.

Having said that he targeted the young at schools and colleges. He was a groomer, not in the accepted meaning, but he worked to shape uneducated minds to align with his values.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top