R
rvinci81
Guest
AND NOW WHAT'S THE BEST?
I did... I absolutely f***en hated WCR! It was nothing close to what real rugby is like. I hated Rugby 2004 aswell, but at least in that game it did have some area's (scrums and line outs) that made it feel like real rugby...Originally posted by kinkon89@Mar 22 2005, 08:19 PM
who the f*** voted for rugby 2004!?!?!?!?!
I wasn't going to be picky and mention it...but now you have so it doesn't matterOriginally posted by robbinho@Mar 22 2005, 12:26 AM
Oh you just know it's a **** thread when someone gets a three-letter acronym wrong.
i null voted, because i knew that someone would have got shitty at meOriginally posted by sanzar+Mar 22 2005, 09:20 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sanzar @ Mar 22 2005, 09:20 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-kinkon89I did... I absolutely f***en hated WCR! It was nothing close to what real rugby is like. I hated Rugby 2004 aswell, but at least in that game it did have some area's (scrums and line outs) that made it feel like real rugby... [/b]@Mar 22 2005, 08:19 PM
who the f*** voted for rugby 2004!?!?!?!?!
I'd argue that if you like pretty graphics and crap gameplay that bares no resemblence to the game of rugby, then WCR is your game...Originally posted by kinkon89@Mar 23 2005, 07:28 PM
wcr was way better than rugby 2004 in gameplay....loved the ruck animation and graphics
but if you like licenses and crappy graphics/gameplay than rugby 2004 is your game
????? Real problems but didn't take anything away from it. Is this supposed to make sense? Surely if there are real problems it'll take something away otherwise they're not real problems. ?????Originally posted by contepomi@Mar 25 2005, 03:23 AM
It had some real problems, but it didn't really take anything away from it.