Same could be said about Robinson, though.15 Cullen Guy had pace everything and could was one of the most dangerous counter attackers ever to have played the game.
I propose we smush the two together and have Jamian Cullinson at 15.
Same could be said about Robinson, though.15 Cullen Guy had pace everything and could was one of the most dangerous counter attackers ever to have played the game.
In my opinion:
1_ Jason Leonard.
2_ Sean Fitzpatrick (Captain)
3_ Os Du Randt.
4_ Martin Jhonson.
5_ Jhon Eales.
6_ Michael Jones.
7_ Richie McCaw.
8_ Zinzan Brooke.
9_ Gareth Edwards.
10_ Hugo Porta.
11_ Jonah Lomu.
12_ Tana Umaga.
13_ Brian O'Driscoll.
14_ David Campese.
15_ Serge Blanco.
damn....could you imagine that backfield all playing at once ?!!
P.S.: totally agree with Habana over Shane Williams. I may personally prefer Wil, but Haban's ability to create out of absolutely nothing, and the (basically) certainty you've got when the ball's made it to that wing in his hands for a 5pter...then there's defensively of course, the problem with short wingers that Habana never had.
Tana Umaga is just another flat ball Pieter Muller.
He had nothing on Tim Horan IMO.
I'd argue that Shane's ability to create out absolutely nothing with probably better than Habana's, can't count the number of matches where Shane dragged us kicking and screaming back into it by creating/scoring all the tries (Scotland and France in 2010 being perfect examples)!
In my opinion:
1_ Jason Leonard.
2_ Sean Fitzpatrick (Captain)
3_ Os Du Randt.
4_ Martin Jhonson.
5_ Jhon Eales.
6_ Michael Jones.
7_ Richie McCaw.
8_ Zinzan Brooke.
9_ Gareth Edwards.
10_ Hugo Porta.
11_ Jonah Lomu.
12_ Tana Umaga.
13_ Brian O'Driscoll.
14_ David Campese.
15_ Serge Blanco.
Perfectly valid argument actually: In the amateur era Lomu was the biggest superstar to ever grace the game. These days everyone seems to have a bigger and faster winger in their ranks.
Full name Robert Fruean
Height 1.90 m (6 ft 3 in)
Weight 105 kg (16 st 7 lb)
Not a winger, but really reminded me of Lomu when I saw him in the ITM this season.
Lomu is/was a bit heavier, but is also a few inches taller
Umm what? Lomu was around 120kg when playing for the all blacks and in high school was recorded running the 100m at 10.8. he got quicker since then. last i heard he held the all black 40m sprint record (this isn't necessarily a fact, just something I heard).
For me, out of players i have seen, when at their best, these are the ones that have to be there:
Wood, Hayman, Johnson, Mcaw, Umaga, Cullen.
Whilst Tim Horan was brilliant, Umaga was incredible. In the days when the fetcher reigned supreme Tana was outplaying the oppositions designated fetchers almost every game, only being beaten sometimes by mcaw and george smith. This wasn't even his job mind you, and nor did this aspect deter him from his real job. He was also an incredible defender, reading defense brilliantly and rarely missing tackles, amazing at organising his fellow defenders. and he was an amazing attacker; always taking the right lines, brilliant sidestep, brilliant offload, the best dummy runner in history, great distributor, a creator, always making the right decisions. heck, I'd even consider putting him in the team as a winger, but it was in the midfield where he reigned supreme. One of the smartest rugby players ever. A legend.
I agree. There was only one area where Umaga wasn't amazing, and that's kicking (though he could grubber very well). Other than that he is the most complete player I've ever seen play. I even prefer him as a captain to Richie McCaw. His tackling was both accurate and ferocious. His work on the ground for a centre was better than any centre I've seen (and I include both BOD and Conrad Smith in there). He not only offloaded better than anyone else at the time - but some of his long passes were spectacular (see his pass to Sivivatu vs the Lions). He ran great lines and very hard, the only centre who is similar in this regard was Mortlock. He had the pace of a winger, and the vision to set players into space from his breaks. Great leader. I personally would take him over Tim Horan - or BOD - although all three are great players.
Umm what? Lomu was around 120kg when playing for the all blacks and in high school was recorded running the 100m at 10.8. he got quicker since then. last i heard he held the all black 40m sprint record (this isn't necessarily a fact, just something I heard).
There's no doubt in my mind that he wouldn't be as effective today. Just look at the back lines he'd be facing when attacking a defense. As opposed to running over a little Mike Catt, he'd be coming up against midfields with guys the size of Jamie Roberts, Manu Tualagi, Jonathan Davies, Mathieu Bastareaud and so on. Even smaller guys like Gordon D'arcy are far more bulky and better tackers than the backs that Lomu would have been playing afainst in the mid to late 90's. With the increase in strength and conditioning, as well as the huge increase in tackle technique and defensive organization, a guy whose game was primarily built around natural strength and pace wouldn't be as effective, as the guys with fewer natural gifts in that area now work 9 to 5 to compensate. He still would have been top class, but I doubt that if he played today he'd approach the same legendary status on the wing.
My bet would be that if he were to play no he'd be a 6, and probably the best out there.
He's be too lazy for a no.6. He started off as a looseforward - but his conditioning was never really good enough (partly because of his kidney disease).
While it's impossible to know how good he'd be now - I still think he'd be considered the best attacking left wing the the world. The guys who he used to bump weren't all Mike Catt's. They were Phil Vickery's and Os du Randt's as well. No doubt he wouldn't be AS devistating as yes, defenses have improved as have the size of players - but I still think he'd be phenominal - and the preference of large outside backs who still don't physically hit the same levels as Lomu is really a testomony to how effective big and fast outside backs can still be.
I'm glad someone said it......
There's no doubt in my mind that he wouldn't be as effective today. Just look at the back lines he'd be facing when attacking a defense. As opposed to running over a little Mike Catt, he'd be coming up against midfields with guys the size of Jamie Roberts, Manu Tualagi, Jonathan Davies, Mathieu Bastareaud and so on.