That pretty eloquently describes my positon, thank you.I see both sides and don't love either
Btw, where are my manners? Best of luck today (and Saturday!), @TRF_Olyy et al.
That pretty eloquently describes my positon, thank you.I see both sides and don't love either
Now you've really got my hackles up (I want England to lose if BJVR is in the side)(and Saturday!)
I want the most scandalous match of all time in any sport tbh.A good game, clear winner, no controversy will do me
My thoughts exactly. I want to see the benches have a full on fight, maybe an eye gouge or 2 and twice as many red cards and pens.I want the most scandalous match of all time in any sport tbh.
I have an issue with footie world cups: they attract the largest amount of fairweather, uneducated and delusional fans in the history of sport. It's unbelievable. The kind that do not even know the rules, scream nonsense, do not know a single lyric to the songs and spend more time pretending to be passionate and recording it on video/selfies than watching the game. And, most importantly, they get you into fights while they run away. After they single handedly provoked them.What are your plans for the game, anything special?
This! In spades. In steroids.I want the most scandalous match of all time in any sport tbh.
The Welsh are experts and knowing what a red card is like for stopping your chances of a final. I guess.My thoughts exactly. I want to see the benches have a full on fight, maybe an eye gouge or 2 and twice as many red cards and pens.
I love this post. Up there with one of your best.I have an issue with footie world cups: they attract the largest amount of fairweather, uneducated and delusional fans in the history of sport. It's unbelievable. The kind that do not even know the rules, scream nonsense, do not know a single lyric to the songs and spend more time pretending to be passionate and recording it on video/selfies than watching the game. And, most importantly, they get you into fights while they run away. After they single handedly provoked them.
Have you seen the comments on yesterday's game? You cannot make that stuff up.
- That wasnt a penalty. (most blatant penalty in the history of fifa wcs)
- If that is a penalty, it shouldnt be (what the actual ****?)
I have no desire, will nor inclination, whatsoever, to be part of such a conversation. And sure, in rugby we don't always agree on what the call should have been, but this is different. This is not about interpretation. This is blatant ignorance tied up with no sense of self respect and a mercurial desire to call for attention. It's unbearable.
And no, it is not just social media. Trevor Noah giving his thoughts on the games. DEar lord. I can understand someone not reading the laws of the game but if you are going to use a big platform for this, at least make sure you know and understand the basics. Or the supposed footie law expert on cbs (?) that kept calling parabolas (the trajectory the ball follows when kicked) 'rainbows'.
I consider myself a rather tolerant person, but this easily exceed my limits. Or lalas claiming the president of a country calling fifa to reverse a RC was ok because in the end, the right result was achieved. I say it again: what the actual ****???
And going to an all argentine bar is just as bad. It's fun and all for the first 30 mins, but that's it. Having a 80 kilo blond screaming at my ear 'that's a foul you inbred **** (ref)' when all you can see is the fairest challenge ever, gets annoying very, very fast. And those places by design attract those sorf of people. So it's a no-no for me.
I'm watchin it with 2 friends at one of their places. Nice, propper, carefully selected and specifically curated beers for the ocassion, snacks and that's it. All i need.
That's one of the things i love about rugby.
If you’ve still got Borthwick in charge for our WC group match next year half your team will deliberately get red cards so they don’t have to play.The Welsh are experts and knowing what a red card is like for stopping your chances of a final. I guess.
I remember when I broke my foot I just laid on the ground saying “it ******* hurts so bad” over and over again.Aren't you a big tough guy lmao.
Its true though, if your rolling around its either way way painfull, or your faking it
While I agree with your post I reserve the right to say “games gone soft” every time a call goes against the team I’m rooting for.I have an issue with footie world cups: they attract the largest amount of fairweather, uneducated and delusional fans in the history of sport. It's unbelievable. The kind that do not even know the rules, scream nonsense, do not know a single lyric to the songs and spend more time pretending to be passionate and recording it on video/selfies than watching the game. And, most importantly, they get you into fights while they run away. After they single handedly provoked them.
Have you seen the comments on yesterday's game? You cannot make that stuff up.
- That wasnt a penalty. (most blatant penalty in the history of fifa wcs)
- If that is a penalty, it shouldnt be (what the actual ****?)
I have no desire, will nor inclination, whatsoever, to be part of such a conversation. And sure, in rugby we don't always agree on what the call should have been, but this is different. This is not about interpretation. This is blatant ignorance tied up with no sense of self respect and a mercurial desire to call for attention. It's unbearable.
And no, it is not just social media. Trevor Noah giving his thoughts on the games. DEar lord. I can understand someone not reading the laws of the game but if you are going to use a big platform for this, at least make sure you know and understand the basics. Or the supposed footie law expert on cbs (?) that kept calling parabolas (the trajectory the ball follows when kicked) 'rainbows'.
I consider myself a rather tolerant person, but this easily exceed my limits. Or lalas claiming the president of a country calling fifa to reverse a RC was ok because in the end, the right result was achieved. I say it again: what the actual ****???
And going to an all argentine bar is just as bad. It's fun and all for the first 30 mins, but that's it. Having a 80 kilo blond screaming at my ear 'that's a foul you inbred **** (ref)' when all you can see is the fairest challenge ever, gets annoying very, very fast. And those places by design attract those sorf of people. So it's a no-no for me.
I'm watchin it with 2 friends at one of their places. Nice, propper, carefully selected and specifically curated beers for the ocassion, snacks and that's it. All i need.
That's one of the things i love about rugby.
I openly said we were hypocrites, the thing is we actually ARE taking the moral high ground with the Falklands so you can't use that argument.You honestly believe that Argentine independence came about because of our right to self determination? Seriously?
This has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with rights, and Chagos is the best example that rights mean nothing, specially to the government that has been using it as a cornerstone for the claim of Malvinas.
Decades, simultaneously claiming self determination to sustain a position on one group of islands while doing exactly the opposite on another. And you want to take the moral high ground by talking about rights? Delusional take.
It has everything to do with power: the ability to enforce one's will. You have that power now. The key word is "now." Spain had that power over us for a time as well.
And what makes them usurpers and you not? They have lived there longer than any other group in history.Not true, and funny enough, that is one of the arguments from the argentine side. There were no british settlements at the time we became independent (1760s till 1833 iirc). They were under spanish control at the time.
That's a point that needs to be argued and supported, not merely asserted. You appear to believe that the usurpers has some sort of acquired rights. We does not.
How can you not see the contradiction while you are typing that?I openly said we were hypocrites, the thing is we actually ARE taking the moral high ground with the Falklands so you can't use that argument.
Good argument! Following that logic if i squat someone's brand new house i have a claim to it since i've lived there longer than the new owner who didnt have time to move in yet.They have lived there longer than any other group in history.
No, because the Falklands isn't the one where we are being hypocrites, it's the Chagos. Therefore if you want to use the hypocrisy argument, that's fine if talking about the Chagos islands but doesn't apply to the Falklands as there we are actually doing the right thing.How can you not see the contradiction while you are typing that?
Good argument! Following that logic if i squat someone's brand new house i have a claim to it since i've lived there longer than the new owner who didnt have time to move in yet.
Outstanding.
Shouldn’t this be on the Politics thread?Morgan Rogers starts. Didn’t see that coming.
I don’t think Saka is fit and Madueke has done nothing so far.Morgan Rogers starts. Didn’t see that coming.
How unfit is Saka, though? I mean, I get taking a big player who isn’t fit but you’re pretty confident they’ll be fine by the KO games. England are at the semis. Just seems a waste of a space when they could’ve taken a Bowen, Foden, Palmer etcI don’t think Saka is fit and Madueke has done nothing so far.