• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

A History Thread

Yes, it was a joke on the **** poor performance of the Jaguar needing a 12 mile runway having watched them limp into the air whilst F-16s are climbing straight up using a quarter of the same runway.
 
Yes, it was a joke on the **** poor performance of the Jaguar needing a 12 mile runway having watched them limp into the air whilst F-16s are climbing straight up using a quarter of the same runway.
Not arguing with you, didn't see the joke anyway

For info.

The Jaguar typically needed 580 m (1,900 ft) with typical tactical load.

The F16 needs 1000m minimum with any bomb load.

The two have completely different roles, the Jaguar is an attack aircraft more akin to the A10 whereas the F16 was designed as a fighter/multi role aircraft.

The last Jaguar built was in 1981 whereas F16s are still being built today with constant aero dynamic improvements and vastly more powerful engines so really they're chalk and cheese.
 
They weren't the finest of troops you could say… a bunch of boozers really and their discipline was poor, they didn't have much money.
They weren't being payed and they lived by nicking things off the local population who didn't like them in the slightest
So, not much changed then.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top