Brumbies vs Raiders

Discussion in 'General Rugby Union' started by ..::ERIC::.., Jan 20, 2005.

  1. ..::ERIC::..

    ..::ERIC::.. Guest

    The Brumbies will play the Radiers.... in cricket. What the hell, a 20 a-side cricket match? That is f***ing whack! Rugby or league would bring in way more crowds.
  2. Forum Ad Advertisement

  3. ???......very thats gonna rake in the millions in ticket sales... [​IMG] da f***
  4. Wally

    Wally Guest

    Actually a Twenty20 cricket match (I figure that's what Eric means) against the two clubs would be awesome! It would be cool if it were televised. Some of those players have represented us at state and national level in cricket. Can't wait to see how Greegs does!
  5. Gay-Guy

    Gay-Guy Guest

    I'd watch if it were soccer. Or touch rugby. Cricket doesn't seem to grab my imagination. No contact except for the bat and ball in cricket. Unless they did what Lance Cairns did in the 80's and throw it at an Aussie batsman's head when attempting a run out. The Aussie batsman looked totally unperturbed when the ball hit him on the back of his neck.
  6. What a strange, but good idea! 20/Twenty is a great idea I can't wait for the internationals.
  7. rugged

    rugged Guest

    There's nothing wrong with cricket but who wants to watch rugby players try to play cricket ie who wants to watch bad cricket?
  8. Ripper

    Ripper Guest

    Many Rugby Players mightve gone preety far in Cricket if they chose it ahead of Rugby, just look at Jeff Wilson...
  9. Wally

    Wally Guest

    That's what I more or less said in my previous post. There's alot of pretty good cricketers there. It's just for a bit of fun.
  10. Ripper

    Ripper Guest

    Sorry, didnt read your post. I usually scroll down the page and miss half the posts
  11. exactly...rather them play netball [​IMG] ...nah they should play gridiron without pads so harrison can get his a## kicked
  12. Wally

    Wally Guest

    Harrison doesn't play for the Brumbies.
  13. ..::ERIC::..

    ..::ERIC::.. Guest

    Nope, I mean 20 players per side.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>
  14. Wally

    Wally Guest

    Well there you go. A two game series with one match of union and another of league would have been better.
  15. well he should play any way and ill smash him [​IMG]
  16. DonBilly

    DonBilly Guest

    Let's dig in IRB archives and find the law of the game in the 1870's when there were still 40 players on the pitch, 20 per team, and no schism yet between League and Union.
  17. thats a fine idea
  18. ak47

    ak47 Guest

    the raiders could do whatever they want and sellout a stadium

    its only coz of the lowlife opposition nobody turns up [​IMG]
  19. BEEPS

    BEEPS Guest


    I see u are as out of date as your name implies.

    It is common for the Brumbies to sell out BRUCE but the Raiders are struggling to sell out Marnica(sp?) oval in recent times. Go with the flow mate, go to Bruce and support the Brumbies or watch the Raiders at the small venue and embrace the loser game. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
  20. Wally

    Wally Guest

    If you think for a minute that if the Raiders had been even half as successful as the Brumbies in recent times that they wouldn't be more popular you are kidding yourself mate.
Enjoyed this thread? Register to post your reply - click here!

Share This Page