Good to read. Better than the first round although still thumpings in half of the matches.
Well, yes. For the same reasons as last week, and as happen in the men's game when it's professionals vs amateurs and there's a huge difference in the rankings.
Probably makes me a bad person but I haven't watched a second of this bar the odd look at the red roses.
My apologies if I came across as judgemental - certainly wasn't meant that way, and not liking what you did see, doesn't remotely make you a bad person.
We all like different things, and yes, jeopardy is compelling.
Personally, so are silky skills, even with a lack of jeopardy - which is why I'm a rugby Francophile. Watching the French team of the late-80s & early-90s fell me in love with the game. Watching the French women's team of the mid-10s fell me in love with the women's game. Their ability to say "f*** it, let's just have some fun" is refreshing and, to me, compelling.
Which doesn't mean that anyone else has to agree with me.
May, or may not, check in on the later stages but I don't otherwise follow the women's game and I'm not going to feign an interest in watching countries I have no connection to or players I'm totally unfamiliar with. I guess everyone gets different things from the sport and there should be room for us all.
Yup, if you want jeopardy and a an existing / national connection - then this RWC isn't likely to have anything for you before the SF stage, and probably not until the final itself - which is absolutely fine.
Equally, if anyone is looking for skills, cohesion, game management and brutality to rival the men's game, then you're not going to find it in the women's game.