Originally posted by Los Lover+Sep 26 2005, 03:54 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Los Lover @ Sep 26 2005, 03:54 PM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-.:kaftka:.
@Sep 26 2005, 03:14 PM
Besides which, you shouldn't even have to. I did what you said Los, and created players with their stats right up there (not 90 players though). Created Larkham, Tuqiri, Gregan etc. etc. Redid pretty much the whole Australian team. It took a while, but I did it. Naturally, I gave them the same generic faces, and just changed the skin colour (orange, dark orange, corny-**** brown.)
I played a game against them with the AB's (unedited) on normal, in fear that they may be too good. Thrashed them in the same style asI used to. I then put ot on hard. I lost he ball in the ruck a lot more than I used to, but still defeated them with the same tactics as always. 25-12 or something.
It makes the game very slightly more competitive, but it's still crap.
what a strange little fellow!!
"i did it......but not the 90 players"
then you didn't do it......and you obviously didn't give them wingers with 100,99,100 etc.....No 90 players = you have NOT done it. get it? If a few playesr have made it a little harder, what do a lot do then logically? Think about it or keep playing wcr and wcr2 - they might be more your style.
"I still beat blah blah with tonga by blah blah" - look, that is good okay (dear god), but I am just not going to take it seriously if the opposition is the out of the box style. I simply won't b/c I have played both.
With the fact that I have experienced both in mind, just accept that I know more than you on this issue.
"but it is still crap" - let's face it, you were never going to say any different no matter what. And you haven;'t changed the amount I said, which makes successive games challenging, so that when you don't play close to your best - you lose. If you are playing really well and your co-ordination is right up there to get the win - why is it you think you should lose. Like in real life, I exopect to lose when I don't get the rubpf the green and I am not A+ and when the edited opposition stands up.
You played one game on normal (what a joke) and one on hard!!!? One game....you only won by about twelve points.....and you come out complaining? Jesus - I don't believe you anyway....so you just went off and edited all these players, played these games and then came and back and posted a reply all while I was out having a quick lunch? Not only is that crazy, but you have also formed stubborn oppinion on the matter (not grounded enough in evidence yet) in this short space of time as well. Let's face it, your stance, as I often point out, was already determined by your desire to argue with me.
Edit in 90 players and the bugger off for a few weeks of occasional play and then come back to me with your comments.....also notice that I have added in the 90 players and can beat the Crusaders (with 11 95+ afverage players) with the unedited Hurricanes team by as much as thirty points at times.....but then they can also beat me. But you reached your conclusion from one result. Come on mate......get serious. I am telling you to change the 90 players for your benefit NOT mine. You are missing out on a great game (especially 2 plyer co-op when players wioth out the ball can be fully controlled before and after the ball ahs been distributed........1000s of your own moves anyone?) b/c you wish to perpetuate an average and unfounded opinion. Jesus - give it a couple of weeks and ACTUALLY edit ALL the players in (don't you have music) and then you can make these claims with some sort of basis for your findings......yes you can win.......me and my mate beat the bulls (who are also edited to a degree) by 50 points and then got done by the edited hurricanes team (who as you know aren;t that good) when their fullback (edited) went no les than 75 metres in the 80th minute and stole the win from us with a 29-27 (three tries a piece thriller)......when is the last time you conceded three tries in a game....exactly...and before you say maybe you suck.....my best score is 134-0 in a 20 minute game on hard in World League division one.....twice in a row. i.e 134-0...next game: 134-0 too. Then I quit as team too good for my liking.
trie are scored from:
- grubbers
- soccer kicks
- short balls
- pop balls
- round the back or reverse balls
- chase through on punts (yep)
- chase thru on the secret punt crossfield chase (i.e. using the drop kick button)
- normal support play and passing
- driving play
- line-outs
- special moves
- scissors
- double-rounds and wraps
- post rebounds
- dropped ball or forced turnovers
- interecepts (yep - get them much more often and much more realistically now as does the cpu....why?....I am no longer answering these questions as the ignorance I have encountered must not go rewarded)
What is it about this game that is crap again...cos when you buy WCR2 you will find that already about five or so of those try scoring techniques will be come obsolete...how do you jumo for a bomb? or defend it against a taller man? Already the game can be exploited - now THAT is CRAP my man. [/b]
