- Joined
- Jan 16, 2020
- Messages
- 9,951
- Reaction score
- 5,523
I know, seems like that these days. I really wanted to know more about this plot but never got an answer.You ok hun? You seem to be having a random conversation with.... yourself!
I know, seems like that these days. I really wanted to know more about this plot but never got an answer.You ok hun? You seem to be having a random conversation with.... yourself!
Kash Patel announces the FBI found supplies of algae seeds when they raided Antifa headquarters.
It’s not uncommon for someone to lose a war to an intellectually superior enemy.
In this case Trump lost to algae.
Probably a dumb question, but what did he say about Obama?Well Trump just used the G7 to smear Obama and claimed the Iranians thought he was a "stupid son of a *****".
Even for the crowd that accept Trumps vulgarity, this must be stepping over the line. It's incredible how easily his followers accept the complete abandonment of any sense of decency or decorum from Trump.
Well that has categorically been proven to be false. She wouldn’t have been as currupt as Trump who has enriched himself since winning last time with his dodgy crypto schemes.I have always said Trump is a massive twat, I just have also thought he was the best option at the time of the elections (on a bad bunch).
Also say that because it fuks my Dad off. (he hates the guy)
He said what I just quoted...Probably a dumb question, but what did he say about Obama?
Fair enoughHe said what I just quoted...
i never said i still think he was the better option...... I just said I did then. Partly to annoy my dadWell that has categorically been proven to be false. She wouldn’t have been as currupt as Trump who has enriched himself since winning last time with his dodgy crypto schemes.
I think it’s fair to say that Harris wouldn’t have gone to war in Iran and wouldn’t have just gone along with everything Netanyahu says. That alone would’ve saved America a boat load of cash and, you know, would’ve saved a few lives and all that.
She wouldn’t have tariffed the whole ******* planet. She wouldn’t have tarnished the USA’s relationship with her allies. I believe she would’ve taken stronger action in support of our allies like Ukraine and against our enemies like Putin.
The list is endless really. But here we are, people still contend he was a better option. Unbelievable really.
You responded to a comment you didn't get to the end of the first line for?Fair enough. I didn't read anything you said
Sounds about right for me yeahYou responded to a comment you didn't get to the end of the first line for?![]()
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/jun/24/prairieland-texas-ice-protests-zines
‘This is injustice’: how leftist zines were used to sentence anti-ICE protesters to decades in prison
Advocates sound alarm after zines were used as evidence to convict protesters of terrorism charges tied to 2025 protest at Texas ICE facility
Quoting a reaction from elsewhere:
These sentences are ridiculous. A huge threat to the possibility of a democratic society. The prosecution is rife with constitutional violations, but 30 years in prison (more than anyone for January 6) for moving some magazines? 50 years in prison even for those not involved in planning the protest? The evidence of an illegal conspiracy is non-existent, but this is how the authoritarian dragnet targets those fighting against repression.
One of the most dangerous and common forms of unconstitutional repression of the left is when the government takes one criminal act and exponentially expands liability for it through the unconstitutional targeting of peripheral people based on their political values using legal mechanisms designed to give the state maximum discretion to crush or to pardon whoever it wants. It's a classic tool of authoritarian repression, and it requires enormous vigilance in the legal system and especially vigilant judges, which in this case not only grossly abdicated that responsibility, but became an active participant in injustice.
But this has been their tactic for almost a decade now. They got their perfect storm. Texas, Texas jurors, Trump appointed or supporting judges that have no issue being political activists for the fascist takeover of the US and attempts to stomp out dissent.
We are seeing them round up protesters in Minnesota, some for just the words they posted online like "become ungovernable".
That is absurd. Getting much harsher sentences than the people who actually stormed the capitol on Jan 6th is ridiculous, especially given there doesn't appear to be evidence that many of these people were involved in the actual criminal behaviour, merely associated with people who were.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/jun/24/prairieland-texas-ice-protests-zines
‘This is injustice’: how leftist zines were used to sentence anti-ICE protesters to decades in prison
Advocates sound alarm after zines were used as evidence to convict protesters of terrorism charges tied to 2025 protest at Texas ICE facility
Quoting a reaction from elsewhere:
These sentences are ridiculous. A huge threat to the possibility of a democratic society. The prosecution is rife with constitutional violations, but 30 years in prison (more than anyone for January 6) for moving some magazines? 50 years in prison even for those not involved in planning the protest? The evidence of an illegal conspiracy is non-existent, but this is how the authoritarian dragnet targets those fighting against repression.
One of the most dangerous and common forms of unconstitutional repression of the left is when the government takes one criminal act and exponentially expands liability for it through the unconstitutional targeting of peripheral people based on their political values using legal mechanisms designed to give the state maximum discretion to crush or to pardon whoever it wants. It's a classic tool of authoritarian repression, and it requires enormous vigilance in the legal system and especially vigilant judges, which in this case not only grossly abdicated that responsibility, but became an active participant in injustice.
But this has been their tactic for almost a decade now. They got their perfect storm. Texas, Texas jurors, Trump appointed or supporting judges that have no issue being political activists for the fascist takeover of the US and attempts to stomp out dissent.
We are seeing them round up protesters in Minnesota, some for just the words they posted online like "become ungovernable".
That is absurd. Getting much harsher sentences than the people who actually stormed the capitol on Jan 6th is ridiculous, especially given there doesn't appear to be evidence that many of these people were involved in the actual criminal behaviour, merely associated with people who were.
"Everyone needs to tone down the rhetoric, shame Pete didn't see this as a chance to do so"
Pete: literally says it's a problem on both sides and needs to be dealt with
Harry: He's not doing enough.
Trump: enflames things with awful rhetoric
Harry: see are you getting upset because he says nasty things?
Harry's hypocrisy and lies are astonishing
Pete is an industrial plant.You might be right, i scanned it so may have missed where he says Republicans and Democrats should stand together, and start working on a more cordial way to politic and lead the country...
Let me know what you find, i wont hold my breathe.
Pete is an industrial plant.