Does that make it right?I'm not an expert on military history but I'm sure, even a cursory bit of research would show the Brits have covered up lots of killings of unarmed civilians and the like, same for the Americans and any other army.
Does that make it right?I'm not an expert on military history but I'm sure, even a cursory bit of research would show the Brits have covered up lots of killings of unarmed civilians and the like, same for the Americans and any other army.
Of course not but it’s on a very long list of why war is hell. It just seems there is a double standard and Isreal are held to a higher standard than other militaries that have done the exact same thing (i.e killed aid workers and covered up the deaths of many unarmed civilians and prisoners)Does that make it right?
The British Army has been killing civilians and non-combatants and covering it up from Bloody Sunday to Afghanistan by some accounts.Whataboutism at it's finest. Don't remember the British army killing a load of aid works then trying to cover it up, even in its worst days.
Absolute rubbish. Do you honestly believe that had the British, American or French army killed a number of aid workers that there wouldn't be an outcry? I'm currently listening to a podcast about the Irish war of independence and they are talking about the shootings at Croke Park which was over a hundred years ago and the British army is still rightly hammered for that and those numbers are tiny compared to the 50k Palestinians killed in the last two years.Of course not but it's on a very long list of why war is hell. It just seems there is a double standard and Isreal are held to a higher standard than other militaries that have done the exact same thing (i.e killed aid workers and covered up the deaths of many unarmed civilians and prisoners)
Ok. I accept that. Was that the right or wrong to do?The British Army has been killing civilians and non-combatants and covering it up from Bloody Sunday to Afghanistan by some accounts.
Wrong but but I'd also say it was wrong for people to say death to the British Army as well.Ok. I accept that. Was that the right or wrong to do?
I’m sure there would but probably nowhere near the level we’ve seen toward the IDF but that’s just a feeling.Absolute rubbish. Do you honestly believe that had the British, American or French army killed a number of aid workers that there wouldn't be an outcry? I'm currently listening to a podcast about the Irish war of independence and they are talking about the shootings at Croke Park which was over a hundred years ago and the British army is still rightly hammered for that and those numbers are tiny compared to the 50k Palestinians killed in the last two years.
Utter utter bullshit. The IDF is far more out of control than the British army was in Ireland and your constant attempts at deflection are ******* tedious now. The IDF in its current state and behaviour are no better than what I witnessed from the Bosnian Serbs and Croats 30 years ago other than Israel has more destructive hardware and better trained troops.
Whataboutism at it's finest. Don't remember the British army killing a load of aid works then trying to cover it up, even in its worst days.
www.britannica.com
Go to Celtic park. Happens every weekWrong but but I'd also say it was wrong for people to say death to the British Army as well.
Don't remember the British army serving in Vietnam![]()
My Lai Massacre - Cover-up, Investigation, Legacy | Britannica
My Lai Massacre - Cover-up, Investigation, Legacy: In spite of reports from Vietnamese officials that a massacre had occurred, the official after-action report characterized the My Lai operation as a success. Seymour Hersh's account of “point-blank murder” at My Lai shocked the world. The...www.britannica.com
It's not like any army tries a cover up
When did I say that?I take it from your post that you support the chant of death to the IDF?
You didn't but again, seeing as only 1 person has responded to my question, it seems so strange to me by the way you talk about Isreal and the IDF being the most evil army on the planet (or at last since Bosnia), that you wouldn't automatically support the chant. I know I would if I thought it was a genocide and the IDF as a whole are targeting aid workers and babies and what not.When did I say that?
No the Russians are arguably worse and their proxies in Africa are definitely worse but Israel is a liberal democracy and absolutely should be held to a high standardYou didn't but again, seeing as only 1 person has responded to my question, it seems so strange to me by the way you talk about Isreal and the IDF being the most evil army on the planet (or at last since Bosnia), that you wouldn't automatically support the chant. I know I would if I thought it was a genocide and the IDF as a whole are targeting aid workers and babies and what not.
Because no one in their right mind would suggest the Brits, Americans or French had genocidal intent in Afghanistan, Iraq etc etc but it's second nature for Isreal it would seem.Wrong but but I'd also say it was wrong for people to say death to the British Army as well.
Missed the British and French settlers in HelmandBecause no one in their right mind would suggest the Brits, Americans or French had genocidal intent in Afghanistan, Iraq etc etc but it's second nature for Isreal it would seem.
No the Russians are arguably worse and their proxies in Africa are definitely worse but Israel is a liberal democracy and absolutely should be held to a high standard
True and in various clubs and pubs around the Falls, Ballymurphy area etc in Belfast no doubt.Go to Celtic park. Happens every week
What’s that got to do with anything?Missed the British and French settlers in Helmand
You talked about genocidal intentWhat's that got to do with anything?