So the real question if youtube an okay source only if you pay for it?
If you stuck Austin Healey on the beeb half of the public would a melt down the second he offered an opinion.I also wondered what should happen if a respected journalist who works for the FT leaves and joins the BBC or any other free content platform. Does that mean their articles should be ignored from that point?
Maybe I now have the excuse I need to stop listening to Jiffy on the BBC. Premier Sports pundits on the other hand should be taken more seriously.
Well I pay for the BBC with my license fee so....I also wondered what should happen if a respected journalist who works for the FT leaves and joins the BBC or any other free content platform. Does that mean their articles should be ignored from that point?
Maybe I now have the excuse I need to stop listening to Jiffy on the BBC. Premier Sports pundits on the other hand should be taken more seriously.
It is for fishingSo the real question if youtube an okay source only if you pay for it?
Nah, cat videosIt is for fishing
Don't forget, fired anyone who is/was supposed to regulate him. Ie, the FAA.Goes in, is given a temporary role that protects him form usual scrutiny, fires all people involved in investigating his companies, steals vast amounts of financial information (including his competitors) then leaves.
I'm just amazed that anyone is stupid enough to not recognise the blatant corruption of the Trump administration.