A Political Thread pt. 2

[Which Tyler]

Real proper serious politics day today and how it should be conducted.

MPs debate legalising assisted dying ahead of crucial vote - live updates

After more than 100 hours of scrutiny in Parliament, today's vote will decide if the bill goes to the Lords or fails to become law.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Which Tyler]

Tugnhadt spouts a load of lies, then says "we need more honesty in this debate"
ETA: Then follows up with false dichotomies and more lies

 

[Flankers' paradise]

2 pretty serious votes this week, with free thought afforded to mps instead of whips trying to rally a position. I hope this sets a precedent

 

[ncurd]

2 pretty serious votes this week, with free thought afforded to mps instead of whips trying to rally a position. I hope this sets a precedent

I'm glad the other one has passed our abortion laws need work but there is doubt fringe groups were trying to weaponise it.

 

[TommiG88]

I think you need to work in complex project planning....

The main issues are
a) Not accepting the real cost of a program
b) Not having clear set requirements at the start and changing them
c) Not accepting the level a complexity of modern systems

The idea people are feckless is something all generations having been moaning about and is frankly lazy and stupid thinking in of itself.



I'm working on a program currently and people are asking why we can't do it in less hours than when they did it 15 years ago. The answer is simple they cut corner and lied in a several places and whilst you might have got away with it 15 years ago you don't anymore. so the project is paying not only to solve its own problems but fixing problem 15 years existing but people turned a blind eye to it.

Couldn't agree more, I work in infrastructure construction and you've pretty much nailed it.

 

[Weldit]

I think you need to work in complex project planning....

The main issues are
a) Not accepting the real cost of a program
b) Not having clear set requirements at the start and changing them
c) Not accepting the level a complexity of modern systems

The idea people are feckless is something all generations having been moaning about and is frankly lazy and stupid thinking in of itself.

I've already discussed this about council's. I do work on projects big and small and I said before they even broke ground HS2 will never reach the north. They're incredibly predictable. Too many people with their hands in the till and too many dancing around what needs doing. Stop defending stupidity.

 

[Which Tyler]

Assisted dying set to become law in England and Wales after bill passed by MPs

Terminally ill people with less than six months to live will have right to choose procedure after approval from doctors and panel

www.theguardian.com

 

[Which Tyler]

I'm glad the other one has passed our abortion laws need work but there is doubt fringe groups were trying to weaponise it.

Agreed - in principle, I agree with the amendment, but I'm finding it really tough to find a decent summary of what it actually means; and there's a tonne of disinformation out there.

 

[ncurd]

I've already discussed this about council's. I do work on projects big and small and I said before they even broke ground HS2 will never reach the north. They're incredibly predictable. Too many people with their hands in the till and too many dancing around what needs doing. Stop defending stupidity.

Okay well my experience running multi-million dollar highly technical project's is entirely diffrent to yours. But my perspective is you're part of the problem as you refuse to accept reality, think people are screwing you and then wonder why what they initially told you became reality and then think its because they screwed you.

 

[ncurd]

Agreed - in principle, I agree with the amendment, but I'm finding it really tough to find a decent summary of what it actually means; and there's a tonne of disinformation out there.

My basic understanding is you can't prosecuted anymore for seeking an abortion even if it fall outside the law.
You can be prosecuted for assisting in one though.

It needs to expanded on assisting for it being okay as long as you believe it was within the law.

 

[Weldit]

Okay well my experience running multi-million dollar highly technical project's is entirely diffrent to yours. But my perspective is you're part of the problem as you refuse to accept reality, think people are screwing you and then wonder why what they initially told you became reality and then think its because they screwed you.

That's okay. Judging by your posts, you've done everything and know everything and can't possibly be wrong. Sounds like you're that far up, you can't look down at the detail and see the problems

 

[dirty harry]

My basic understanding is you can't prosecuted anymore for seeking an abortion even if it fall outside the law.
You can be prosecuted for assisting in one though.

It needs to expanded on assisting for it being okay as long as you believe it was within the law.

Apparently, according to the missus (midwife) andni havnt researched this, but this only effects around 3 to 10 people per year, and only 3 mothers per year on average.

Of those, due to the physical, but mostly mental state of the mother, prosecution is near impossible, and most women need intervention.

Makes sense, if 3 women per year are doing this, and they are in absolute crisis, how is the threat of criminalsation going to deter their actions?

Everyone else involved can still be charged though

 

[ncurd]

That's okay. Judging by your posts, you've done everything and know everything and can't possibly be wrong. Sounds like you're that far up, you can't look down at the detail and see the problem

Thanks for acknowledging my superiority. You made a sweeping statement, I explained why I felt you sweeping statement was wrong and you said "nut uh I'm right".

 

[Weldit]

Thanks for acknowledging my superiority. You made a sweeping statement, I explained why I felt you sweeping statement was wrong and you said "nut uh I'm right".

That's literally what you did

 

[ncurd]

That's literally what you did

You quoted this you think its a sweeping statement?

The main issues are
a) Not accepting the real cost of a program
b) Not having clear set requirements at the start and changing them
c) Not accepting the level a complexity of modern systems

The idea people are feckless is something all generations having been moaning about and is frankly lazy and stupid thinking in of itself.

 

[Which Tyler]

Do we need mummy to come and bang heads together?

 

[Weldit]

Do we need mummy to come and bang heads together?

Nah, we're good. It's just funny how flimsy the argument is based on

 

[ncurd]

Do we need mummy to come and bang heads together?

Nah nothing interesting being said was at the stage of deciding if I can be arsed to reply or not. Harry's been stinking up these threads so much trying to look for a decent conversation is hard.

 

[TommiG88]

I've already discussed this about council's. I do work on projects big and small and I said before they even broke ground HS2 will never reach the north. They're incredibly predictable. Too many people with their hands in the till and too many dancing around what needs doing. Stop defending stupidity.

I'm sorry, but I disagree. This just feels like a wide generalisation. Yes there are some people out of their depth on projects, yes there are some bums on seats that aren't good enough for the role, but this isn't the majority. Major projects encounter so many unknown variables.

I won't go into detail as it will be an essay.

 

[General Melchett]

I'm sorry, but I disagree. This just feels like a wide generalisation. Yes there are some people out of their depth on projects, yes there are some bums on seats that aren't good enough for the role, but this isn't the majority. Major projects encounter so many unknown variables.

I won't go into detail as it will be an essay a Harry-esque post.

FTFY