- Joined
- Jan 16, 2020
- Messages
- 4,789
Good start to the week.
I think you'll find it was a "hard landing"
Yes, that was what the initial reports were saying, when to all intents and purposes they were looking for the wreckage.I think you'll find it was a "hard landing"
With a side helping of gravity.I think you'll find it was a "hard landing"
Republicans hate it cause they don't acknowledge international law as a concept and democrats hate it cause it lacks due process.Surprised the US isn't a member of the ICC. Not sure if this stance is good for Biden given recent protests or the needed youth vote in November. Senators also threatening sanctions against the ICC.
View attachment 19926
International law has to negotiate a tricky balancing act. On the one hand, international law is good, or it's good to have shared ideas across the globe about what states should and shouldn't do, especially when conducting war. But on the other, if you go too hard the other way and say have an enforcement facet to international law, or you make countries ability to wage war difficult, then you risk undermining international law and states will be like what's the point in it and will ignore it completely. Tricky but we've probably got the balance about right. I personally wouldn't want to see some global enforcement agency but I also wouldn't want to live in a world with no international law either.Republicans hate it cause they don't acknowledge international law as a concept and democrats hate it cause it lacks due process.
I think it's something ridiculous like Israel accounts for more resolutions passed by the UN than any other country in the world. Israel has faults but it's far from the worst country in the world.International law has to negotiate a tricky balancing act. On the one hand, international law is good, or it's good to have shared ideas across the globe about what states should and shouldn't do, especially when conducting war. But on the other, if you go too hard the other way and say have an enforcement facet to international law, or you make countries ability to wage war difficult, then you risk undermining international law and states will be like what's the point in it and will ignore it completely. Tricky but we've probably got the balance about right. I personally wouldn't want to see some global enforcement agency but I also wouldn't want to live in a world with no international law either.
A country that allows anyone of a certain faith to obtain citizenship and uses this function to assist with their continuous illegal plantations and stealing of land, and to perpetuate apartheid and more recently genocide is far from the worst?I think it's something ridiculous like Israel accounts for more resolutions passed by the UN than any other country in the world. Israel has faults but it's far from the worst country in the world.
The genocide and apartheid claims are very arguable to be fair but I think we might be working off different definitions.A country that allows anyone of a certain faith to obtain citizenship and uses this function to assist with their continuous illegal plantations and stealing of land, and to perpetuate apartheid and more recently genocide is far from the worst?
They don't have slaves so I guess they're not the worst but they're right up there with the top dogs in my opinion.
Come on, Israel does deserve resolutions against it, but it had more resolutions passed against it than the rest of the world combined. Bearing in mind the rest of the world include Syria, Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Burma, DR Congo etc etc. Do you really think Israel's abuses outweigh all of that?A country that allows anyone of a certain faith to obtain citizenship and uses this function to assist with their continuous illegal plantations and stealing of land, and to perpetuate apartheid and more recently genocide is far from the worst?
They don't have slaves so I guess they're not the worst but they're right up there with the top dogs in my opinion.
Yeah but we get stupid resolutions like give should the Falklands away. To pretend the Arab world doesn't use it for point scoring and repeatedly done so is naive.Come on, Israel does deserve resolutions against it, but it had more resolutions passed against it than the rest of the world combined. Bearing in mind the rest of the world include Syria, Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Burma, DR Congo etc etc. Do you really think Israel's abuses outweigh all of that?