But I never said that I said it was key he does. Leinster have 4 10s. It impossible to please them all. I never said anything about Prendergast not playing.Baseless speculation that Prendergast won't play enough rugby is what I've been arguing against this entire time, it's pointless, negative and when I see it elsewhere seems very malicious. Thats where the Crowley comparison came from and I'm not crying about it, I'm very much using it to show you Prendergast is on a similar trajectory if not a little bit ahead.
When I was backing Crowley a few years ago there was no "he has to play games or he won't reach his potential" and he was behind Carbery and Healy in the 10 shirt at the time.
If anything based on the reports tonight I think Leinster just made a big mistake with Harry Byrne and a new contract if the mumblings are true.
If Prendergast does improve you'd imagine he gets in the 23 fairly fast.
If he gets in the 23 you back him to make starting jersey his.
Jack Crowley was the same. People were saying he had to be a 10. Remember his first few games were 12. People were hesitant about that. But people said the same because it is just facts about 10s. Same for Frawley. He will never reach a tip URC level 10 even because he is a utility player. A good 1 and will do for 10 or 15 mins a game etc like final. And make serious impact.
On Crowley by the way some people backed Ben Healy too it was a divide in some senses whereas everyone is united on Prendergast.